Nick Bostrom And Rebecca Roache: Article Analysis

Only one thing is certain; humans are not perfect, no matter how much we try to enhance ourselves. Nevertheless, centuries have been spent on the pursuit of constructed divinity, a heavenly definition that is too ambiguous to consider plausible. As Nick Bostrom and Rebecca Roache explore in their article, Ethical Issues in Human Advancement, this topic is very complicated and nuanced. Therefore, during this relatively early implementation of human enhancement, it is important to make decisions on a case by case basis. In cases where people feel incapable of functioning every day or having a fulfilling life, enhancement is worth the risk. On the other hand, in cases where individuals seek human enhancement where there would be no direct and …show more content…
History should warn that quick fixes are not sustainable answers that lead to real satisfaction. Kenneth L. Garver and Bettylee Garver’s article on the history of negative eugenics is one example of how delicate the topic of human variation is. Counterarguments address what society deems as “normal.” Since there is discrepancy in that definition, it is nearly impossible to legitimize a rigid set of rules for everyone. Infact, many see any set of rules that hinders human enhancement to go against evolution. To rebut, is to recognize that every living person has the right to choose what kind of life they want to live so long as no harm will be done to others. Accordingly, human enhancement is powerful on an individual and societal level. If a greater understanding and appreciation of history is not applied to the decisions made, no innovation will be improvement. Therefore, as we move forward, human enhancement must be safeguarded as a influential yet dangerous tool that will undeniably change society for generations to come. So, extreme caution paired with controlled curiosity is the way to