Neil Gorsuch Case Study

Improved Essays
Who is Judge Neil Gorsuch? He is currently forty-nine years old and a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States. He has the typical high educational degree background any Supreme Court justice has. He attended and graduated from Columbia, Harvard, and Oxford. His religious background is a bit unusual, he grew up Roman Catholic and attended weekly mass with his siblings but now he attended an Episcopal Church. Gorsuch seem like a good family man with traditional religious values and non-traditional religious values. He has an outstanding educational background and has been working with the law and court system for a very long time. He is a republican and a conservative who has gat friends. He is the perfect candidate to fill the vacant seat in the United States Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch religious views can make or break him as a nominee for Supreme Court justice. He grew up Roman Catholic and with his siblings he attended weekly mass. When he and his wife Louise, whom he met while attending oxford, returned to the United States they began attending St. John's Episcopal Church. Because he attends a church that is "Pro-gay, Pro-Muslim, Pro-green, and anti-Trump" some people are concerned about where he stands and what his agenda. A Washington newspaper even went as to ask the questions "Is Gorsuch a secret liberal?" He isn't very outspoken about his religious views and hasn't declared weather or not if he is a Catholic or Protestant. I believe we will soon find out if he is confirmed for Supreme Court of the United States. I believe with his religious backgrounds that he won't be afraid to make he'll be considered and rethink decisions that would not only affect the people around but also the people of the United States. Judge Gorsuch Academic background and political work history speaks for its self. He has earned degrees from Columbia University, Harvard University, and University College, Oxford. He served as a judicial clerk for Judge David B. Sentelle from 1991 to 1992 and then went on to clerk …show more content…
Once you’re a Supreme Court that is it, no going back. A Supreme Court Justice should have experience in making favorable and unfavorable rulings before he or she takes the job. Judge Gorsuch does have experience with rulings of that kind. One of Gorsuch's most high profile rulings is the Frozen Trucker case. A summary of the case: A truck driver abandoned his cargo to find help because he knew if he stayed in that truck any longer he'll start to expire from the extreme cold. Truck drivers are not supposed to abandon their load and the company fired him because he did so. Gorsuch ruled in favor of the company because the company's rules and policies. The company rules and policies are law and Gorsuch follows the law, is a man of the law. He was the only judge on the Tenth Circuit to reach this conclusion. On a political level, this would make him a great choice of the U.S. Supreme Court because he is not afraid to make unfavorable decisions. On a personal level I believe this is a bad because he chooses the law over life. The truck driver could have died but he said the law is the law and he should have followed the rules. With I believe this is one of the cons of him being nominated for the U.S. Supreme

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.” Theall believes her experience as a judge and lawyer will allow her keep her personal beliefs out of cases and solely make a ruling from the facts presented. “As a judge you learn very quickly that your personal opinions don’t matter,” she said. “Your opinions are solely based off the facts and evidence in front of you.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What got Clarence the job came from the retirement of the former African American Supreme Justice Thurgood Marshall, and which led Bush to nominate him as a replacement. In 1991 he was barely confirmed not including being accused of sexual harassment by a lawyer in public hearing. Now we know how he got in Supreme justice but what…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this model, judges act purely according to their own viewpoints, beliefs and preferences regardless of their court coworker’s reaction and response. For this reasons, this model of judicial behavior seems to lack theoretical consistency and reasoning. Judges’ policy preferences have a significant and possibly larger role in the judicial decisions making process (Ivers). Thus, legal considerations are also relevant in this process and cannot be ignored due to the fact that judges make decisions inside a legal framework.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louie Gohmert was born on August 18, 1953 in Pittsburgh, Texas. Louie is currently married to his wife Kathy, and they have a total of three children together. Before getting into politics Louie graduated from Texas A&M University then shortly after graduated from Baylor University’s Law School. During his time after college Louie also served as a captain in the U.S. Army. Before being elected to Congress in 2005, held many different positions in the state of Texas.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Horace Gray Essay

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason I chose Horace Gray as my Supreme Court Justice is that he was the deciding justice on some landmark decisions in United States’ history. For instance there is United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) as well as Ball v. United States (1896). Another reason I chose Gray as my Justice was due to the fact that he appeared to be really intelligent. He accomplished many things at a much younger age than normal people would. For instance he enrolled into Harvard at just the age of thirteen.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Koch Case

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article Recap: Charles Koch Republican billionaire and donor Charles Koch of Koch industries has been reportedly given George Mason University about $48 million between 2011 and 2014.According to a Yahoo Finance report, the public school located outside Washington DC has quietly become a new conservative bastion for economics and law. Tax records indicate that that Charles Koch gives nearly $20 million to hundreds of schools in the US. In 2014, the foundation gave George Mason $16.8 million to fund the schools Humane Studies division. This amount was 30% of all donations the school received from private donors. A report by The Council for Aid to Education reported that George Mason received a total of $44.6 million in fiscal contributions…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Don’t judge a book by its cover! I like to repeat this saying in my head when I catch myself judging others too often. While reading this article, I thought of this saying again. The author of this article, John Kavanaugh, wrote how one should only leave judging up to God or in other words there comes a time and a place for judgment. There are all different types of judgments; good, bad, sound, or reasoned.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays