Nature Vs. nurture has been one of the biggest debates on psychological development. Until today people argue about the dominant factor, while some people believe that the psychological attributes children develop is because of their genetics(nature), others believe that nurture is the more contributing factor in that manner .
Thesis statement: Both nature and nurture play a huge role in human behaviors, the genetic combination and the surrounding environment will help shape what kind of person you are. …show more content…
(McLeod,2007)
V paragraph five: Nature and crime: a-Many crime cases where the criminal isn.t mentally stable:
1- Seung-Hui Cho, a senior at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, was exposed to bullying. Ended up shooting and killing 32 people and wounded 17 others in two separate attacks, then killing himself eventually.
2- “A study of young men and women who had been adopted as children found they were up to four and a half more times to have been in trouble with the police if one of their natural parents had a criminal record.” (“Is life of crime hereditary”, daily mail)
VI paragraph six: Nature and homosexuality: a- Evidence supporting that genetics are the main contribute to homosexuality.
1-“ Karen Hooker executed the first psychological test done to test for biological determinism in 1957, A study to notice the correlation between homosexuality, illness and psychological development. These three tests, the Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and the Make-A-Picture-Story Test (MAPS). The results of Hooker’s experiment showed no contradictions on any of the three tests. She concluded no relationship between social life of sexuality.”