Nature vs Human
There are many ways in which human beings have could create changes towards the earth’s environment. Currently, humans are involved with a considerable amount of changes to the planet, stemming from large differences like carbon dioxide emissions or smaller scale changes like creating houses. Many of these changes originate from a plethora of social forces that alter the world. These interactions create hostile living conditions and can also have a long term unfavorable planet. Most of the problems that are direct effects from human interaction are a constant ongoing event that need to be handled in order to better salvage the world. Interactions between humans and the environment create an unsuitable environment due to the …show more content…
Some of the forces that lead to social change fall into three categories: Cultural values, power/political values and economic values. These values help contribute to the ethical, governmental and market applied reasons as to why society makes cultural or behavioral changes over time. Social changes and the major forces that control them can be somewhat difficult to distinguish. Many of the founders of sociology, Marx, Weber and Durkheim, argued which of these forces was the strongest contributing factor to social change. For example, Durkheim believed that social changes and how society changes over time have a greater impact on overall social change. Contrary to Durkheim, Weber studied how the power of state bureaucracies made a more longer lasting change on social issues. In terms of climate change, economically, costs of mitigation to prevent raising temperature could halt a country from the prevention of emitting fossil fuels (Michaelowa, 2015). Whether it be power, culture or economical, there are forces that can lead to social changes that can affect the …show more content…
Water is considered a natural resource, untouched by humans and a basic right to anyone or anything. It can be considered a cultural good due the belief that all civilizations can have access to the resource that creates and gives life. However, as world problems arise, the interaction between humans and nature creates an unnatural sense to the world. For instance, the Bolivian water crisis brought upon controversy of control over a natural resource. There were economical values that were put in place to control what was considered natural. Because of this, the water crisis created conflict and war. As the Anthropocene continues onward, man and nature create a hostile environment by creating an unnatural scene for the world which can result in a mostly negative consequence. For there to be an equilibrium, there must be a fair amount of how much social interaction plays on the role of how humans change what is natural and nature itself. Without the equilibrium, there will continue to be world
There are many ways in which human beings have could create changes towards the earth’s environment. Currently, humans are involved with a considerable amount of changes to the planet, stemming from large differences like carbon dioxide emissions or smaller scale changes like creating houses. Many of these changes originate from a plethora of social forces that alter the world. These interactions create hostile living conditions and can also have a long term unfavorable planet. Most of the problems that are direct effects from human interaction are a constant ongoing event that need to be handled in order to better salvage the world. Interactions between humans and the environment create an unsuitable environment due to the …show more content…
Some of the forces that lead to social change fall into three categories: Cultural values, power/political values and economic values. These values help contribute to the ethical, governmental and market applied reasons as to why society makes cultural or behavioral changes over time. Social changes and the major forces that control them can be somewhat difficult to distinguish. Many of the founders of sociology, Marx, Weber and Durkheim, argued which of these forces was the strongest contributing factor to social change. For example, Durkheim believed that social changes and how society changes over time have a greater impact on overall social change. Contrary to Durkheim, Weber studied how the power of state bureaucracies made a more longer lasting change on social issues. In terms of climate change, economically, costs of mitigation to prevent raising temperature could halt a country from the prevention of emitting fossil fuels (Michaelowa, 2015). Whether it be power, culture or economical, there are forces that can lead to social changes that can affect the …show more content…
Water is considered a natural resource, untouched by humans and a basic right to anyone or anything. It can be considered a cultural good due the belief that all civilizations can have access to the resource that creates and gives life. However, as world problems arise, the interaction between humans and nature creates an unnatural sense to the world. For instance, the Bolivian water crisis brought upon controversy of control over a natural resource. There were economical values that were put in place to control what was considered natural. Because of this, the water crisis created conflict and war. As the Anthropocene continues onward, man and nature create a hostile environment by creating an unnatural scene for the world which can result in a mostly negative consequence. For there to be an equilibrium, there must be a fair amount of how much social interaction plays on the role of how humans change what is natural and nature itself. Without the equilibrium, there will continue to be world