Introduction
I have been always very sceptical about personalities tests, seeing them as another form of horoscope or fortune cookies which establish a set of vague of personalities descriptions.
Although I was aware that Myers Briggs personality test are used by companies all over the world, I knew that they lack scientific credibility.
Despite these doubts I have approached the Module 4 Group Assignment with positive and enthusiastic attitude. Surprisingly my Myers Briggs test turned out to be very close to reality. I have been classified as ENFP which described me as” independent, energetic and compassionate person, that can change the world with an idea”. According to my co-workers and friends I am actually a person that could be described …show more content…
For the consistency of the communication I obliged to inform the absent person about our meeting outcome by email. I believe that it actually could be more useful if I would send the Meeting Notes to the whole group, so everybody could double check the agreed content and amend anything.
I found it difficult to quickly estimate the strengths of our team, so I had to base on assumptions and personal preferences while allocating the tasks. Absent people were responsible for collecting the information on Clients Profiles. As a result they have been also chosen to become the Clients Board, so the rest of the group could work together on the presentation. Such as allocation of roles was matching the personality profiles and division to Extravert (presentation sub-team)/ Introvert (research/ Client Panel sub team).
Overall the spread of roles was encouraging the group strengths and complement our own weaknesses. I am not very precise person therefore I was glad that the other colleague from the group was happy to take the responsibility for the ITT documentation analyse. I was feeling comfortable in leading the team work, generating the overall approach and deciding on form of Brochure Content and setting out the Presentation …show more content…
Our initial presenting trio was not performing very well and we had to face the difficulty of changing the one person presenting. It was very stressful situation to all team, as suddenly we had to make a critical decision that engaged both personal and professional aspects. Process was finally well explored and this last action became beneficial. I was really glad that the team approached it in a very professional way, which strengthen ourselves. As the result our presentation team included the strongest personalities and the most natural presenters which was the best solution in the time-limited
I have been always very sceptical about personalities tests, seeing them as another form of horoscope or fortune cookies which establish a set of vague of personalities descriptions.
Although I was aware that Myers Briggs personality test are used by companies all over the world, I knew that they lack scientific credibility.
Despite these doubts I have approached the Module 4 Group Assignment with positive and enthusiastic attitude. Surprisingly my Myers Briggs test turned out to be very close to reality. I have been classified as ENFP which described me as” independent, energetic and compassionate person, that can change the world with an idea”. According to my co-workers and friends I am actually a person that could be described …show more content…
For the consistency of the communication I obliged to inform the absent person about our meeting outcome by email. I believe that it actually could be more useful if I would send the Meeting Notes to the whole group, so everybody could double check the agreed content and amend anything.
I found it difficult to quickly estimate the strengths of our team, so I had to base on assumptions and personal preferences while allocating the tasks. Absent people were responsible for collecting the information on Clients Profiles. As a result they have been also chosen to become the Clients Board, so the rest of the group could work together on the presentation. Such as allocation of roles was matching the personality profiles and division to Extravert (presentation sub-team)/ Introvert (research/ Client Panel sub team).
Overall the spread of roles was encouraging the group strengths and complement our own weaknesses. I am not very precise person therefore I was glad that the other colleague from the group was happy to take the responsibility for the ITT documentation analyse. I was feeling comfortable in leading the team work, generating the overall approach and deciding on form of Brochure Content and setting out the Presentation …show more content…
Our initial presenting trio was not performing very well and we had to face the difficulty of changing the one person presenting. It was very stressful situation to all team, as suddenly we had to make a critical decision that engaged both personal and professional aspects. Process was finally well explored and this last action became beneficial. I was really glad that the team approached it in a very professional way, which strengthen ourselves. As the result our presentation team included the strongest personalities and the most natural presenters which was the best solution in the time-limited