First, the True Colors test determined that I was mainly a “gold” which tends to be one that is very orderly, prepared, follows all the rules, and tend to be serious. Very much like Dr. Shelden Cooper, from the Big Bang Theory. At first glance, I didn’t think that this “gold” personality necessarily fit me. When going through and actually reading the scenarios, I determined that …show more content…
I feel as if this test was very similar to the results from the True Color test because the themes of discipline, consistency and focus are very similar to what the “golds” are. For that reason, I can see that these points are my main traits. However, this test emphasis the points that aren’t necessarily part of the “typical gold”, which makes me unique. However, I asked my friends if these new traits were accurate, they commented that these traits are very situational and aren’t necessarily what I am like all them time. For example, focusing isn’t necessarily something that I do all the time, I tend to be a very hyper individual sometimes and find it hard to focus (like while I’m trying to write this paper). I feel that my other top traits that weren’t necessarily a top five theme, are still a very important part of …show more content…
However, Strengths Quest also shows that I don’t necessarily oppose CHANGE in all settings due to the learner and analytical theme. This shows me that I also tend to want to understand information and why people would break the rules (not that they should commit this crime). In a group setting this would make me a more lenient “gold” because I accept people being late and breaking rules. This would also help in a group setting because I would want to learn as much as I can about why something occurred. The analytical theme is according to the description is very similar to this. The paper describes my analytical “the ability to think about all the factors that might affect the situation” (Strengths Quest 5) . I think about why people act the way they