Before getting any further, it’s worth noting that this movie is based off a book by John Le Carre. Apparently it follows the book closely, but the book is long, with too many details to fit into a two-hour movie. Thus, there are things left out, including some of the cohesion. But it is still somehow possible to follow at least most of the plot – however difficult it may be. But this difficulty is symbolic of how it is for Smiley to track down the mole. We can’t rely on Smiley to do all the work for us; we have to figure some of it out ourselves. The problem is that many viewers aren’t ready to think like spies themselves, even if they’re educated adults. It takes a specific mindset to enjoy this movie, and many people don’t like to think while watching movies. But those who do take the effort to think like spies will not only comprehend the movie, but also learn some of what it may be like in Smiley’s shoes. Because it’s true. In real life, it’s more difficult to find spies than in one scene in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, where it’s easy to see a Russian spy through the window. But instead of this literal interpretation, the movie demonstrates through story structure how difficult espionage really is. Smiley makes it look easy. In real life, many spies go unnoticed, while other times ordinary people are falsely accused. …show more content…
The only actual objection they have to this movie is that the scriptwriters brought in anti-Americanism that is apparently part of Le Carre’s other books. Being an American organization, the CIA isn’t happy with this negative light. They noted some other small differences, such as a less ethically ambiguous ending than that of the book. But any change from the book is an act of freedom of expression, and whether the CIA likes it or not, it’s protected under the Constitution. Thus, the CIA can only criticize from a