Examples Of Moral Relativism

Improved Essays
Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history. For example, the colonies, particularly the puritans, had very strict ideas of right and wrong, church was mandatory, as was reading, but only because they wanted children to be able to read the bible, they wanted to be considered a “city upon a hill” which basically means they wanted to be looked up to in terms of morality. Moral absolutism was …show more content…
The big idea of this time period was that the colonies were very diverse and there were no signs that the colonies could band together against England for independence. There was very little religious tolerance in this time period, the puritans wanted to be considered a “city upon a hill”. The first great awakening also occurred during this time period, it was in reaction to the enlightenment and many new branches of christianity were created. LIfe in the colonies was very hard at first, and it was hard for the colonies to get their footing. The mortality rate was very high and boats struggled to bring people and supplies quickly enough. One incentive used was the promise of land for people who came to work in the colonies, and the use of indentured servants (slaves for a certain amount of time) helped the colonies finally establish successful colonies. At first, colonists came looking for gold, but they didn't find any, the main successful product that came from the colonies was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For the most part, I believe Americans would like to make decisions based on moral absolutism as that seems to be right decision to make, but in all reality, guidance is based on moral relativism due to so many variables that take place today. Ruth Benedict discusses in A Defense of Ethical Relativism what various cultures viewed as a moral absolutism in a particular part of the world but may be seen as moral relativism in another part. Benedict discussed homosexuality as being accepted in the American Indian tribe years ago but one would have never thought it possible when thinking about the era of cowboys and Indians as they portrayed a very masculine image. The Northwest Coast civilization’s known practice was when an individual was killed,…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to moral relativism, or ethical relativism, all views, no matter if they vary across cultures or people, are equally valid and no single belief is absolute, but is satisfactory to the moral standards of a person or group of people. These beliefs are stemmed from ones’ environment or preference. Just because something may be right for you, doesn’t necessarily mean that it is right for everyone else. Ethical relativism is linked to normative subjectivism, which describes the state under which a certain action may be considered right or wrong. This means that the action of another can be considered right if the person pursuing that action believes so.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many cultures in the world, from the western culture of America to the Inuit culture of Siberia. Cultural Relativism argues that every culture, no matter how different, is entitled to their own beliefs and other cultures do not have the right to take offense to another culture’s beliefs. This means that morals that may seem correct in one culture may be considered morally wrong by another culture. An argument against cultural relativism would be that if Cultural Relativism were considered to be fact societies could not criticize their own culture meaning there could be no change in culture.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans often wonder why others have acted in a way that is against the observer’s morals. How could the United States have Japanese Internment camps during WWII? How could the Huns physically tear people apart in the villages they raided? How could the Hutus create and engage in the Rwandan Genocide against the Tutsis? Sumner answers this question with ethical relativism: morality is relative to the time and place.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism is a commonly held position among many. This could be due to the regard for the value of tolerance or the truth in descriptive moral relativism. But my argument will be against meta-ethical moral relativism: there exists moral truths but these truths are not absolutes but relative. If morality is relative, there is no ultimate right or wrong.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moral Relativism Examples

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    If I returned home after going to the grocery store and found that I had not paid for a pack of gum that I intended to buy I would not take the gum back immediately. I would first call to see if the store would even want me to bring it back. This seems like the most morally correct answer, second to just taking the gum back right away. Keeping the gum would fit into the ethical category of “taking things that don’t belong to you”, Although keeping a pack of gum might seem like a minuet thing to do, it still violates categories within ethics. I believe moral relativism relates to this situation because if I had realized that the store didn’t charge me for the gum while I was still at the store, I would have immediately paid for it.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism is defined as the idea that whatever culture makes it okay, as along everyone in that culture agree with it then it 's okay. Moral relativism is good to keep everyone in peace by how everyone would agree with it and not debate about the arguments. But Moral relativism is not the right way say for example that the majority of the people accepts that cause pain to other people is a good thing.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is at theory which puts forth the notion that values and ethical judgments can only be evaluated within the context of individuals or cultural groups. An ethical relativist would argue that there are no such things as an objective right or wrong when it comes to the views that he hold. If this were true, there would not be much of a point to doing ethics at all. I would have my beliefs, you would have yours, and neither of us could be right or wrong because right and wrong could only be compared relative to our own value system. This is obviously not that case.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual relativism is the belief that moral values and norms are merely expressions of subjective preferences of individual people. An example of this theory would be me believing vegetables are disgusting while you believe vegetables are absolutely delicious. This form of relativism states that what one believes must be true; therefore, I'm right in believing vegetables are disgusting. However, you would also be right in believing that they are delicious. Social relativism implies the belief that moral values and norms are based off of the dominant attitudes within a given society or culture.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Explain with examples what is meant by moral absolutism. [25] Moral absolutism is the ethical belief that there are absolute standards against which morality can be judged, and that actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of the context of the act, or the culture, time or place. Moral absolutists believe that there is a universal set of absolutes which are true for all time, in all place and all situations, and every person has an obligation to follow these absolutes. Moral absolutism is deontological, as actions are inherently either moral or immoral regardless of the situation or the individuals involved, and moral absolutists are only concerned with the action itself, not the results of the action.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Relativism

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ethical relativism is a very ambiguous concept. As a whole includes the views of various different countries and cultures which, in a nutshell,…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that moral relativism does undermine moral confidence and this is a benefit of the theory. The theory of relativism holds the beliefs that: moral truth is not out in the world waiting to be discovered, it is not universal, and that it is a product of history and culture. In turn morals in the theory of relativism are socially constructed ideals only holding value as long as they are part of a culture. The view that morals are only valuable within a cultural context is acceptable as there would be no moral value without culture. A similar example of this can be seen with the use of currency in cultures.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism states that morality is based on what a society or culture believes is right. An ethical relativist believes that what is moral in one culture or country may not be moral in another if they have differing values. As such, one really can’t criticize how another culture or segment of society lives. There is not one moral code or standard that applies to all under this theory.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lgbtq Community

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First, ethical relativism as defined by Williams and Arrigo (2008) is simply stating that morality is relative to a particular culture, time periods and varies from time to time. To further elaborate, one must be willing to consider that what may be true and just in one time period may not be considered the same in a different era. For example, think of slavery in the United States. During that time period, it was an agreed upon set of values that it was okay to enslave African-Americans and make them serve, White Americans. Once the guiding principles of slavery began to be questioned and how inhumanely injust it was at that time, it was only then that slavery was abolished.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compared to our previous view that is more based in absolutes, moral relativism remains neutral and believes that anything goes since right and wrong concepts are determined be a single individual.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays