I was critizing the decisions of the courts thinking about who careless they could be to give a lady millions of dollars for something that she did herself. On top of the face that were was the common sense with this women not to be more careful with the coffee, already knowing that coffee would be hot. But I have to say that after watching the you tube video in class I have a very different view on the case. After viewing the court case video with all the acutall faces and exibits, I was able to better understand why the women sued McDonalds. When looking at the case, Mrs. Liebeck had a large amount of third degreen burns on her body that left here in the hospital racking up medical bills over 10 thousand dollars.…
Case: Schulz v. Kroger Co.., 963 N.E. 2d 1141 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) Facts: The Schulzes are appealing the trial court’s summary judgement in favor of Kroger Co., and their knowledge or the existence of any hazardous conditions in its store. Procedural History: Customer, Dixie Schulz allegedly slipped over clear liquid and fell, brought premisis-liability action against Kroger. The Hendricks Superior Court, Karen M. Love, J., granted Kroger’s motion for summary judgement.…
During all of the time before the coffee incident McDonalds were aware of the dangerous conditions of the coffee inherent in serving to its customers. During the litigation it was also determined that they knew of the likely consequences of such acts, the risks involved and acted with a conscious disregard for the safety of their customers. Once an implied warranty of fitness has been created and is violated then it is a violation of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-315.…
The coffee craze is the United States is growing rapidly and getting out of hand. Many people are paying for overpriced beverages made with suspicious ingredients. In Dave Barry’s newspaper column, “Decaf Poopacino”, he explains that “the specialty coffee craze has gone too far.” He supports his claim by using an anecdote from his own life along with informal comedic diction to relate to the reader and make is point more clear. His humorous tone allows him to entertain the reader and it allows him to make his irritating experience seem like a comedic and relatable story.…
The introduction is a brief overview of the integration of fast food into American society and how it reflects on American society and ultimately our way of life. There is a particular stress on Mcdonalds and “the Mcdonaldization of America” which is a consistent theme held throughout the book. Particular ironies are exploited in the introduction between the company’s ideals versus the men who build them. Colorado Springs is used as the focal point of the book and the revolutionary changes that are apace there provide a perfect backdrop for what is really happening all over the United States.…
The biggest surprise to me was that Mrs. Stella Liebeck never asked for anything more than just what she could not cover medically, and for McDonalds to look into it so this did not happen to anyone else. The extent of her injuries was also a surprise. Learning the fact that she was a passenger and her nephew had pulled over while they got situated did change my perspective. I do believe that it was Mrs. Liebeck’s fault for spilling the coffee, however McDonalds had been aware of several incidents that had occurred with their coffee causing severe burns. Before reviewing the fact, my opinion was that people would sue for anything and that it was all Mrs. Liebeck’s fault for spilling the coffee.…
It is not necessarily a physical object; products can include goods, services, people, places and ideas (Walker. I., 2000, Marketing Theory and Practice, lecture 1). Products enable a company to differentiate itself from competitors and gain competitive advantage. Products can be positioned based on attributes, benefits offered, usage occasions, users, against or away from competitors, or based on the products class (Walker. I., 2000, Marketing Theory and Practice, lecture 6).…
Research the case of Stella Liebeck, an elderly grandmother who received third-degree burns when she spilled coffee purchased at a McDonald’s drive-through. What was the basis of her claim against McDonald's? The basis of Liebeck claims was that she was severally injured after purchasing a cup of coffee through the Mc Donald’s drive thru in Albuquerque, New Mexico on February 27, 1992.…
Many people believe that they know the facts of the case, but after conducting multiple street interviews, the film makes clear that the information that is commonly known about this case is false. To test this ignorance further, I asked my friend and my father about the facts of the case, and both had completely different, but both false, information. Overall, it is evident that this was not a frivolous lawsuit, as Liebeck was forced to have multiple reconstructive surgeries due to the horrific burns she received. The jury assigned 20% fault to liebeck and 80% to McDonalds, largely because of their negligence and failure to respond to multiple complaints regarding their coffee temperature, which was found too hot for human consumption later in discovery. Liebeck was awarded a jury verdict of $2.7 million dollars, which would have been an ample amount to cover her extensive medical bills, however the Judge found this amount to be too large to serve as punitive damages, making her final reward reduced to $160,000 compensatory, $480,000 punitive.…
It has been an enduring tradition for American adolescents to undertake a job while still advancing their education. Nonetheless, Amitai Etzioni challenges this tradition in his essay “Working at McDonald’s” by stating that fast-food chains, such as McDonald’s, are not beneficial to adolescents. He argues that such jobs are unbeneficial because they lack room for creativity or long-term growth. In his article, Etzioni makes note that two-thirds of American high school students have part-time jobs.…
Did you know that McDonald’s headquarters is located in Oak Brook,IL. Although, there is 36,000 more locations around the world. While this is impressive, nobody should eat at McDonalds. Not only is McDonald’s food not completely safe, but it will make you overweight. Their food is full of dangerous unknown bacteria and calories.…
All fast food lovers know the struggle of where they should eat. “I am in the mood for some grub, but which sounds better, Wendy’s or McDonald’s?” Fast food has been around ever since the 1950s, and you cannot deny they have been a success. There are many different food types depending on the restaurant such as a burger place, Mexican food, and sometimes even Chinese. For the classic burger lovers, you may have had to make the decision between Wendy’s and McDonald’s at some point in your life.…
The McDonald’s Coffee Case The McDonald’s coffee case is another recent, publicly rousing verdict. Although the case was not as serious as the Trayvon Martin case, it did raise public astonishment that a jury could find a major corporation culpable for one of its customers burning themselves. Despite the that the media downplayed the plaintiff’s injuries, the case led the public to question whether the verdict was fair. Criminal justice researchers have used jury decision-making models to determine that, in fact, the jury did not compensate the plaintiff…
1. You may ask what McDonaldization is. McDonaldization is defined as, “the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to dominate more and more sectors of American society as well as the rest of the world.” This paper will discuss two different cafes which conduct the same matter of business, however one business conducts more like the principles of “McDonaldization” compared to the other business which is a local café in Dubuque that is more traditional (has a less emphasis on the formal rationality). So my one McDonaldizated café is “Starbucks” and my other café is the “Rubix.”…
In the documentary Super Size Me, narrated and directed by Morgan Spurlock, Mr. Spurlock sets out to see just what effect eating fast food can have on a person’s health. Numerous questions are posed during the film, so it is difficult to determine the exact thesis of the argument. After filtering through all of the information, I determined the main point of the argument to be that McDonald’s knowingly provides unhealthy food to Americans and wants us to eat as much of its food as we can, therefore making us fat. Mr. Spurlock sets out on an experiment with himself as the subject, in which he eats nothing but McDonald’s food for 30 days. Although Mr. Spurlock does present evidence that fast food is unhealthy, I am going to focus on all of the inconsistencies and fallacies in his argument.…