Milgram's Experiment Unethical

Improved Essays
When the Milgram’s experiment is discussed most people consider the study unethical, but the real question is, is it really unethical? As was stated on simplypsychology, by Mclead “Stanley Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person.” To do so, he picked out random people and put them in a situation where an authority controls them. However, he told the participants they are a part of a study examining the effects of punishment on learning. He didn’t inform the participants of the real purpose. According to the APA code of conduct of ethics, the basic guideline is “in describing or reporting their qualifications, services, products, fees, research, or teaching,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychological testing that took place in the Milgram experiment was interesting to me. Even though I had learned about the experiment in previous courses, I had never seen actual footage from the testing. The most disturbing moment of the video was when one “teacher” was obviously in disagreement about administering the shocks, but continued…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One particular author that analyzes Milgram's experiment and his lack of consideration for his subjects is Diana Baumrind in her article, "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience. " Baumrind describes the futile effects of Milgram's experiments and the traumatic, emotional disturbances as unnecessary and harmful toward the test subjects (Baumrind 92). She also includes how Milgram's experiment is not an accurate model to any real-life situations, let alone have any comparative connection to Hitler's German Officers and the Holocaust (Baumrind 93). She concludes with how she believes in the experiment that the subjects should have been fully informed of the emotional and psychological dangers before involving themselves to be apart of the test (Baumrind 94).…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem in 1961.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Stanford Experiment During the Milgram and Stanford experiment, each person had a special role. When given a role, people try their best to fulfill their duties no matter what is required of them. These experiments aim to understand how far someone will go to obey their superiors and follow instructions. You were either a prisoner, guard, teacher, or a learner. Each and every one of these participants were influenced into having demand characteristics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1961 and 1962, psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments designed to test an ordinary citizen’s capacity to inflict physical harm on another human being. Based on the results, Milgram concluded the core of obedience occurs when a person perceives himself as the means for carrying out the wishes of another, and therefore no longer considers himself responsible for his actions. Were Milgram’s experiments ethical? Were his conclusions valid?…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that the subject needed a clearer way to disobey to improve this experiment. Milgram would argue that in real life scenarios no one tells you that you can disobey if you want, it is up to the individual if they certainly feel uncomfortable and uneasy to stand up for their morals. An article over Milgram and his experience from Wayne State University’s psychology department would logically bring attention to the credentials of Yale University and how that may affect the subjects’ thoughts: Why would you think that a large highly regarded university performs potentially dangerous experiments to random volunteers (Wayne State)? It discusses how this is a relevant factor in the subjects decision making. Milgram would state that the Nazis were in the same boat.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1963, an experiment was conducted by Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram, who studied the conflict with obedience, authority, and the conscience of a human being. In the experiment, Milgram designed a false scenario, in which one person would volunteer to be the “teacher” and the other person would be the “student” (who would be the actor). The teacher would read a list of word pairs and test the student’s memory. Afterwards, the teacher would say the first word of the word pair and the student would have to answer the second word of the word pair through memorization. However, if the student would get it wrong, then the teacher would shock the student.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram experiment was considered ethical then, but surely it was close to crossing the line. Now, however, it would be considered unethical due to the deception towards the subjects. The Stanford prison experiment, on the other hand, was not ethical then and wouldn't be considered ethical now. Anything that would lead to psychological harm is unethical and would never be allowed today. There has been events in the past that exemplifies what these researchers found.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His use of language gives a complete detail description demonstrating the procedures of each participant in the experiment of what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram portrays a research experiment by means of two individuals to test the boundaries of obedience which requires to be responsible for agony upon a person. In what way can an individual legitimize the brutality that was exposed in the research experiment merely because they were obeying commands made by authoritative figures? The experiment brings to light the lack of ownership of one 's actions an individual is willing to take when they feel they were simply following orders. Milgram makes a good point when he states that "the experimenter did not threaten the subjects with punishment – such as loss of income, community ostracism, or jail – for failure to obey" (p. 409-10).…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays