Marxian Class Theory: Marx's Manifesto Of The Communist Party

Improved Essays
THE BOUGEOISIE, THE PROLETARIATS AND CLASS STRUGGLE:
MARXIAN SOCIOLOGY

Sociology of Class conflict

Marxian sociology is also called “The sociology of class conflict.”
The main idea of Marxian Class Theory is to be found in the opening of his “Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848” which reads as follows:
“The history of the hitherto existing society is the history of the class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guild-master and journey man, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on uninterrupted, now hidden and now open fight, a fight that each time ended in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in common ruin of the contending classes. ”1

It is clear that at every stage in history, there is war between the classes. The landowner exploits the landless, and the factory owner exploits the workers. Between classes, there is endless antagonism and hatred. Class conflict is the severest form of class antagonism. War of the classes Marx says that a particular class owns and controls the means of production, and exploits the rest of the people. He says that capitalists make use of the state as an instrument of oppression and exploitation. Exploiting classes give rise to opposite classes. Hence, thesis and anti-thesis. Capitalists here form the thesis and the serf or the proletariat form the anti-thesis. The Bourgeoisie or the Capitalists and The Proletariats or the Working Class The most distinguishing feature of any society is its form of property. An individual’s behavior is determined by his relations to property. Classes are determined on the basis of individual’s relation to the means of production. Means of production represent a type of property, which in the capitalist society is owned by the capitalists. Here, an individual’s occupation is not important but his relations to the means of production are important. According to Marx, capital is gained from the exploitation of the masses of population, the working class, by the owners of means of production- the bourgeoisie. The capitalist system transformed masses of people into workers. Through the development of class consciousness, the economic conditions of capitalism united the masses and constituted them into a class of itself, the proletariats. Exploitation of the working class Exploitation of the workers can only add to their misery and poverty.
…show more content…
But the same exploitation helps the rich to become richer.
In every mode of production which involves the exploitation of man by man, majority of people, the people who labor, are condemned to toil for no more than the barest necessities of life. With this, society gets divided into rich and poor. To Marx, poverty is the result of exploitation and not of scarcity.

Alienation

The process of alienation is central to Marxian theory of class conflict. The economic exploitation and inhuman working conditions lead to increasing alienation of man. Alienation results from a lack of sense of control over the social world. The social world confronts people as a hostile thing, leaving them alien in the environment.
The workers caught in the vicious circle of exploitation find no way to get out of it. Hence they lose interest in work. Work becomes an enforced activity, not a satisfying one.
The responsibility of the worker gets diminished because he does not own the tools with which he works and he does not own the final product too. This situation of alienation heightens the mood of the worker for a conflict.

Class struggle Due to alienation, the working class internally becomes more homogenous and this helps to intensify the class struggle. Because of this, the workers form unions against the bourgeoisie. They come up together to demand higher wages, better living conditions etc. Conflicts break out and riots happen here and there. This is what class struggle basically is, in Marxist ideology. Marx’s prediction Marx predicted that the capitalists would grow fewer and stronger as a result of their endless competition, that the middle class would disappear into the working class, and that the growing poverty of the workers would spark a great revolution. He felt that the revolution would be a bloody one. This revolution would bring to end the capitalist society and lead to the social dictatorship of the proletariat. Since the revolution would result in the liquidation of the bourgeoisie, they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How have perceptions of communism in Russian society changed over time? What were the factors leading to these changes? Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist, who published the Communist Manifesto in 1848. He was an influential writer and in his writing he conveys the idea of communism and how the proletariat will ultimately gain political power. That the abolition of private property will result in a society with no classes, hence no class antagonism.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concepts of labor and property play a key role in shaping the political theories of Locke and Marx. How the two political theorists define labor and property and their purposes shape how they view freedom, rights, and the role of government. Locke sees private property as something that arises from an individual's labor. For Locke, private property is a natural right and the role of the government is to protect the individual's property. In contrast, Marx believes the private property is the product of alienated labor.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Karl Marx ideas were not popular, he provided a different viewpoint of capitalism and suggested an alternative to relieve wage workers from capitalist societies during the Industrial Revolution. Marx believed that differences in social classes were a form of human development, in which economic domination was becoming a part of human nature. Since everyone was being subjugated by work rather than focusing on themselves, he thought that a capitalism society stopped or minimized people’s awareness of their own potential. Karl Marx saw capitalism as a system involved in opposition, exploitation, and dehumanization, in which he came up with The Communist Manifesto, to help the working class overthrow the coercion that capitalism produces. Marx also mentions that bourgeois society has influenced and created new forms of struggle between classes and being treated unfairly within society and that it is constantly changing.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is an emotion that is typically explored by psychologists. This can be studied by sociologists too. Sociologists have developed theories that explain responses based on group dynamics. Karl Marx and C. Wright Mills both have a view on society based on the class system. Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays