Mark Antony's Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

Superior Essays
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, words play an enormous role in the outcome of this famous tragedy. They are used to inveigle, laud, coax, rally, uplift, and many more. There are three prominent writing strategies used throughout this play. First, ethos is used to interest the audience’s sense of ethics or morals. Second, pathos appeals to the audience’s heart and emotion. Third, logos is used to engage the audience’s logic or reasoning. These methods of writing can be found in the funeral speeches of Mark Antony, who had the most effective speech, and Marcus Brutus, who had a mediocre and schlocky speech. Everyone has some sense of right and wrong, whether it is based on the Bible or society. Both Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony take advantage of this when they are giving their speech at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus was a well-known and respected man in that society, and people are more likely to believe someone that they trust and like. He says in his speech, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. …show more content…
In Brutus’s speech, the overarching lie is that Caesar was ambitious when he was not. Logically, that cannot stand because the people know Caesar and if they stop for a moment a think about all of Caesar’s actions they would clearly see that he was not. Brutus asks the people a simple question though: would they rather live as slaves with Caesar reigning or live as free men with him dead? (This question is also considered when discussing the use of ethos in his speech.) Antony, however, uses all that Brutus says to his advantage. He tells the people the following facts about Caesar: he brought captives home from Rome, he cried with the poor, he was offered a crown three times and refused all of them, and he was loved by the people. Antony says, “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, but here I am to speak what I do know.” The words Antony spoke were accurate and could not be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He hopes the people will think he is more trustworthy using ethos. Antony also uses ethos by saying "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransom did the general coffers fill. " Antony lets the people forgot about Brutus's speech by telling them about all the people he brought home. Brutus tries to convince the people…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The speech given by Brutus in William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar was most effective due to the use of pathos, ethos, and logos.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Brutus and Antony give competent speeches at the funeral of Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar. Brutus tends to appeal to logos and ethos while Antony focuses on appealing to the pathos of the audience. When all is said in done, however, the circumstances combined with Antony's skilled demagoguery made his speech the more compelling for the audience of the two. Brutus’s speech, despite not being quite as successful as Antony’s speech, still has its merits along with its flaws.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He demonstrates Caesars reliability, and by saying this he is indicating regard for his dear companion in endeavor to influence the natives to feel as though they have a similar relationship. Antony’s credibility is talked about in, “Antony thus exploits the very tension between public and private speech upon which Brutus had relied. And we have some reason, at least, to find Antony’s claim credible.” (Nevo). Caesar may have wished to trust self-esteem is the thing that moved him to noble deeds, he is moved in yearning by a want for the love of all the people.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony repeats seven times within his speech,”but Brutus is an honorable man” but he is implying Brutus is not. His sarcastic tone furthermore shows Brutus is just the opposite. Antony makes it look like Brutus is fine with betraying someone who loves him, making it look like Antony would not react that way if he were in Brutus’s shoes. By gaining more trust of the Roman’s he continues to manipulate them even more. Antony claims he is a plain and bluntman and is not a good speaker, but he actually is a great speaker.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend and never saying goodbye. Imagine witnessing their last breath as they are brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Antony says this because Brutus was the only conspirator who acted for the good of Rome. Therefore, because Brutus acted for the sake of Rome rather than envy…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive than the one Brutus gives because he uses better tactics and more powerful rhetoric. In his speech Brutus uses gravitas and ethos which in the end backfires because it makes his speech less relatable and portrays him as better than the plebeians. Mark Antony gives his speech after Brutus and he uses this to his advantage by using verbal irony and more specially sarcasm. Mark Antony uses pathos and exaggeration to create powerful rhetoric and to connect with the human emotions of the plebeians. In his funeral speech Mark Antony uses tactics that better relate to human nature and better connect with the plebeians rather than Brutus who tries to appeal to logic…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rylee Sellitto Ms. Heaton RL 1 English 10 November 4th, 2015 Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On March 15, 44 BC, Brutus killed Julius Caesar for the freedom and protection of Rome. According to Brutus he says, “I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him but as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (ll. 26-27). Another reason as to why he killed him was his ambition. Perhaps Brutus thought that Caesar had too much ambition.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays