We take experiences from life as well as daily obstacles and learn from them. Andragogy theory is derived from four assumptions differentiating from pedagogy. Those four differences are changes in self-concept, the role of experience, readiness to learn, and orientation to learning. During changes in self-concept we go from having to depend on others to do everything for us to being completely independent. Malcolm Knowles states that when you reach the age and you are able to begin in the work environment that is when you take a huge leap toward adult life, also known as being completely independent. The second assumption of androgagical theory is, the role of experience. With this assumption they believe the older an individual gets and the more they personally experience the easier they can relate to a subject as well as learn from that subject. Readiness to learn is the third assumption. During readiness to learn they think that we learn our needs as we develop mentally and physically. It is believed that people need and learn more adequately with hands on experience first and then in class work second. Lastly, there is orientation to learning. Children are saw to be self-centered orientation while adults are saw to be problem-centered …show more content…
David Kolb was the Chairman of Experience Based Learning Systems. David had worked diligently to receive his Bachelors in psychology, philosophy and religion. David has also accomplished in mastering his Ph.D. in Social Psychology. He attended Knox College which was followed by his attendance at Harvard University. David studied experiential learning for well over 50 years and feels that he has only broadened his horizon on experiential learning, but never veered away from his beliefs in any significant way.
Experiential learning is based on a form of learning from a day to day experience, much like the beliefs that Malcolm Knowles had. During the time that David was researching experiential learning he came across other great professors with likewise thoughts.
Learning in which the learner is directly in touch with the realities being studied. It is contrasted with the learner who only reads about, hears about, or writes about these realities but never comes into contact with them as part of the learning process. Keeton and Tate