Majority Tyranny

Improved Essays
Whenever making a tough decision, whether it be in a classroom, with friends, or on a sport team, the saying has always been majority rules. Whatever the largest sum of people want tends to always win. This idea correlates directly with our government today. Majority tyranny is a bigger threat than minority tyranny to American democracy today because the size and power that majority groups obtain make it easier to gain control or possibly overthrow our government. In federalist paper 10, James Madison talked about the threats that factions pose in our government today. Another example of majority's taking control in our world today are political parties: with the democratic and republican parties in control today, it is nearly impossible for …show more content…
He defined factions as “groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions.” According to this definition, large factions are no different than majority groups. Madison discussed how “factions are a result of human nature,” and “cannot be avoided.” The same concept applies to majority groups. James Madison talked about the threat of majorities when saying that “when a faction gains power, they use that power to promote their own interest, even at the expense of minorities.” In this short sentence, he summarized the danger that majority groups posed against society then, and still pose against society today. Majority tyranny is more dangerous than minority tyranny to American democracy today because as James Madison said in Federalist 10, often times majorities are willing to do whatever it takes to benefit themselves, even at the expense of minorities. a good example of a majority tyranny might be Donald Trump and his supporters. He and his supporters are so intent on promoting their agenda that they are not willing to consider the needs of the minority. This creates an environment of fear and mistrust of the majority which is far more dangerous than a fear of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    of C.’s lack of authority (which is necessary when running a government to some degree) James Madison expresses that just because one certain state does not side with the majority it has delayed the reformation of a more efficient government. (Doc. A) This shows how incapable the A. of C. was at the time unlike the constitution which only requires a ⅔ vote to pass an amendment.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison is stating that the result of the constitution checks and balances system will help prevent tyranny. In document D, it outlines certain articles of the constitution that say, “Representatives...shall be appointed...according to...population,” and that,“The senate...shall be composed of two senators per state.” This means that the Legislative branch's two parts are equal in representation. As a result of this, no one state will have more power which in turn will prevent tyranny among the…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17) Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind. People would essentially vote for or against certain issues in order to benefit or prevent being hindered by them.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, Madison expands upon it by providing a way to eliminate the drawbacks of negative factions. This is what birthed the 1st Amendment in order to protect everyone's rights.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison wanted to due away with the idea of a Pure Democracy because of the accepted idea that democracies inevitably dissolved because of factions. Factions commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others. A common faction many officials worried about when creating a new governing document was the “various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.” , as stated in the PowerPoint “Understanding Federalist…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison argues in his article of The Federalist No.10, Our government was created to accomplished governing the aggression and corruption cause by factions. Madison characterizes factions as groups of individuals who assemble to secure and advance their exceptional financial interests and political suppositions. Despite the fact that these groups are inconsistent with one another, they conflict with citizens in general interest, and in general other citizens interests as a community. American people are divers by nature, having distinctive thoughts and viewpoints, with the capacities, and assets. Along these lines, people have a diverse interest on a basic level, interests which they will bolster, regularly to the detriment of different…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which brings me to my next topic: Separation among the government. James Madison was one to think that the Articles of Confederation wasn’t good enough, that there needed to be something new and better create. The Constitution gives the three branches of government the chance to have powers the other one may not have. The point of separation is that the government isn’t just a big group of people that meets every month and discusses their issues and creates new ideas, They made three groups because if there was just a big, gigantic group of people, everyone would try to take control by himself and rule over everybody else. In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison had written “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly the very definition of tyranny.”…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of a republic serves as a control for the effects of factions. Factions emerge when groups of people feel their ideas are not being heard and accounted for in government. Madison describes these groups as having interests against the interests of the whole country. The design of a republic, especially the one created in the Constitution, encourages representatives from various interest groups to have a voice in lawmaking. Therefore, controlling factions is a matter of having elected officials to represent different groups.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Madison also is keen to promote the unity of the United States of America. The Federalist publications, after all, were the means to an end of gaining support for the ratification of the constitution which proposed a centralized, or Federal, government. Madison exemplifies the glory of a republic, on the size of the United States, when he goes to say, “Hence, it clearly appears that the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic.” (Great Documents 41). After this new republic has been practiced for eight years under Washington, one could say that it appeared to be justly unifying.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10 and No. 51 assume that it is in our human nature to be selfish. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison states that factions will always exist. The only way to prevent a faction from being too powerful is to have numerous factions competing with one another. Democracy and self­interest creates factions. Federalist Paper No. 10 gives specific ways to eliminate the negative effects that factions create.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To prove his reasoning, Thoreau gives an example of the unjust practice of majority voting. He says, “When the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted... to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right,...but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (Thoreau, 2). Basically, Thoreau is explaining that in a majority vote, not everyone is treated fairly. Those who are a minority must then forcefully abide by the decisions made by the majority.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While majority is a major tenet of democracy, it is flawed because the largest and strongest group is not necessarily the most just. Therefore, government policies and federal and state laws are a cesspool of injustice and iniquity. The government imposes itself on its citizens, leading to immoral citizens with an undue respect for a corrupt system. Instead, Thoreau argues, citizens should use their consciences and not blindly follow the government; they should make decisions based on moral codes and not legal…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is true to say that majority rules, but not to the exclusion of the minorities’ rights. In enacting laws, a democratic government strikes the balance between majority and minority interests. If a legitimate decision is made by a majority of the people, but that decision negatively affects the fundamental rights of a minority of the people, then the decision must be adjusted to reflect what is fair and equitable to all citizens. By this said, each individual within a democracy is represented fairly. For example in reading, “Illiberal Democracy,” Fareed Zakaria states, “It has greater respect for individual rights and press freedoms, and even its economy is in theory more open to competition and foreign investment,” (121).…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays