As such, the memoir is filled with both reflection and descriptions of his emotions while in the heat of battle. Blunden discusses his feelings towards the war effort paired with his observations of the events around him. Narratively, the memoir lacks structure, at least in terms of plot. Instead of acting as linear description of events, Blunden recounts his experiences episodically. The chapters do not lead into or connect to each other, but contain passages filled with detailed imagery and flowing prose. The combination of Blunden’s clear recollection of vivid events and writing prowess give the work its power over the reader. Blunden’s ability to describe horrifying events with artistic grace is captivating and haunting. Many critics have lauded his writing style, claiming the “delicacy with which it deploys the properties of traditional English literary pastoral in the service of the gentlest (though not always the gentlest) kindest of irony” (277) to be the major factor that elevates the quality of the work. However, in order to understand why the irony in the work is integral to its success, one most clearly understand what irony is in the literary sense that Blunden uses it, and the effect it has on the
As such, the memoir is filled with both reflection and descriptions of his emotions while in the heat of battle. Blunden discusses his feelings towards the war effort paired with his observations of the events around him. Narratively, the memoir lacks structure, at least in terms of plot. Instead of acting as linear description of events, Blunden recounts his experiences episodically. The chapters do not lead into or connect to each other, but contain passages filled with detailed imagery and flowing prose. The combination of Blunden’s clear recollection of vivid events and writing prowess give the work its power over the reader. Blunden’s ability to describe horrifying events with artistic grace is captivating and haunting. Many critics have lauded his writing style, claiming the “delicacy with which it deploys the properties of traditional English literary pastoral in the service of the gentlest (though not always the gentlest) kindest of irony” (277) to be the major factor that elevates the quality of the work. However, in order to understand why the irony in the work is integral to its success, one most clearly understand what irony is in the literary sense that Blunden uses it, and the effect it has on the