Lindbergh Baby Case Study

Improved Essays
This essay will discuss and provide an analysis how the three main components of the criminal justice system: Police, Courts, and Corrections apply to the 1932 Lindbergh Baby Case. In addition, this essay will discuss how first appearance, preliminary hearing, and arraignment apply to the Lindbergh Baby Case. Finally, this essay will discuss adjudication, sentencing, and corrections pertaining to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping.
In 1927, Charles Lindbergh and his family had received a lot of attention after he flew nonstop across the Atlantic Ocean from New York City to Paris. Due to this remarkable event, Charles Lindbergh became an American hero and wealth soon followed. The Lindbergh’s were followed by people throughout the world can became
…show more content…
The prosecution is to prove without a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty while the defense is to refute evidence by the prosecution. The judge oversees both the prosecution and defense to be sure a trial is fair, and all evidence is admissible to be considered by the jury in deciding a verdict. In the Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping case, the court system is seen when Hauptmann has his first appearance in the courts and is indicted by the Supreme Court on charges of extortion of $50,000 from Charles Lindbergh. In a preliminary hearing at the Hunterdon County Courthouse in New Jersey, grand jurors unanimously voted to indict Hauptman for murder in 1934 (Linder, 2017). Two weeks after being charged with extortion, Hauptmann learned at the arraignment about being charged with murder as …show more content…
This evidence was circumstantial and included handwriting samples which matched the handwriting on the ransom notes, tool marks on the ladder matching tools owned by the accused, and the same type of wood from the ladder found in his attic. On January 3, 1935 the trial of Hauptmann began in Flemington, New Jersey and lasted roughly five weeks. The judge oversaw the trial and due to a guilty verdict returned on February 13, 1935, the accused was declared guilty of murder in the first degree. Once a verdict had been handed down by the jury, the sentencing phase of the case begins. After the legal evidence of the factual issues involved in this case, the adjudication was the death penalty. Adjudication is defined as “the legal process of resolving a dispute” (REFERENCE). Furthermore, aspects of the court system which can be applied are appeals. Hauptmann and the defense team appealed the verdict and sentence. Unfortunately for Hauptmann, on December 9, 1935, the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey upheld the lower courts verdict of guilty. During the appeals and resentencing phase of the Hauptmann trial, another component of the criminal justice system is seen, that is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A case was either solved by a judge or by the people involved, which was contingent on where the involved people stood on the social ladder. In cases that included a judge, a big investigation was put into place to try and determine the facts and get a correct sentencing. They tried their hardest to make the newly founded system work. Although, as hard as they tried, the justice system had very little funding, which, ultimately, resulted in both innocent and guilty people suffering from it. A popular tactic used by hired prosecutors was to use torture methods to get a quick confession and a shorter sentencing, therefore, saving the system time and money.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egelhoff. Ann German represented the respondent, and the petitioner (Montana) was represented by Joseph Mazurek. At the end of the trial, Egelhoff was charged with two counts of “premeditated murder”. Which in Montana is a crime essentially defined by knowing that you are purposely committing a murder (LLI, 3).…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you know the similarities between Christopher Columbus and Charles Lindbergh? Do you even know who they are? Well if you don't then I am about to tell you all about it. I will even take you across to different journeys across the Atlantic.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bsbwor501 Part 1

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    PART 1: SHORT RESPONSE 1. The steps in which the defendant is found guilty is a process of eleven steps. The first step there will be an investigation, shortly after the second step would be too arrest the suspect. When the suspect is escorted to the police station he/she will going through the third step booking into the system. After he/she is booked they will go through the fourth process of attending an initial appearance.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prosecutor in the retrials was…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 1920s was a time for change and celebration, filled with individuals that had made an impact on the society, including Charles Lindbergh. A man who had changed aviation forever. However, there was another figure in France, that was known to have equal talent to Charles Lindbergh. The United States press called Jean Mermoz, France’s Lindbergh. Jean Mermoz and Charles Lindbergh were brilliant and courageous aviators who strove to do great things.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both were faced with the demands of financing and successfully navigating their treks across the daunting Atlantic. Neither Columbus nor Lindbergh were successful or financially well-off men, and asking those with money to finance their adventures was no simple task, as they had valid concerns of the men succeeding, especially Columbus, who requested such a large amount of money from the Spanish monarchy for his hopefully profitable expedition. With their individual charisma and determination, however, they did eventually succeed in their effort. Lindbergh gained enough money for his plane - named “The Spirit of St. Louis” in honor of his financiers - and various supplies. Columbus acquired three ships, money for trading purposes, enough crewmembers for all three vehicles to be suitably managed, and other necessities required for a voyage spanning an unknown amount of months out at sea, posing a greater loss for Columbus should he fail.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Lindbergh Kidnapping was one of the biggest crimes of the 20th century. Charles Lindbergh was best known for being the first man to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean and make no stops. He was also a military explorer, author, inventor, and social activist. On March 1st, 1932, his son, Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Jr., was abducted from his home in New Jersey.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. Attention Getter: Have you ever heard the name Lucky Lindy or the Lone Eagle? II. Thesis: Today I will be talking about the great American aviator Charles Lindbergh. III.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, not all criminal cases are overseen and processed in the criminal justice system in the same way, shape, or form as the criminal justice system is composed of different parts, stages, and agents each with varying differences, functions and goals. One important agent that has continually been examined in terms of roles, functions, and effectiveness is the…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amelia Earhart Specific purpose: To inform my SPC-112-W003 class on Amelia Earhart’s wonderful accomplishments and life events. Central idea: Amelia Earhart was more than just an aviator she was a record breaker who was full of courage. I. Introduction a. Attention-getter: Amelia purchased her first airplane within six months of having her first flying lesson, which is very unusual because people don’t purchase their first plane until they have completed their lessons.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Heffernan faced a few moral dilemmas when he was working as assistant to the District Attorney. One in particular was when he was faced with a moral challenge in the case of a defendant Heffernan presumed to be guilty, but had been denied a fair trial by jury. Heffernan was confronted with the decision of whether or not to challenge an appeal made by the defense so the defendant could have a fair trial by jury. But with a new trial, the defendant stood a chance of winning his trial since the previous witnesses were out of the country. Then a presumed murderer would be free on the streets.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays