From a broad perspective, Lincoln tenaciously embraced the notion of suppressing conflicts from erupting between the North and South alike. Venturing deeper into the specifics, he additionally elucidated upon how conflict would most definitely not break out, unless the South fostered its development. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “Lincoln’s inaugural address was firm yet conciliatory: there would be no conflict unless the South provoked it. Secession, the president declared, was wholly impractical because ‘physically speaking, we cannot separate’” (Cohen & Kennedy 421). The quote above sheds light upon how secession was ultimately deemed “unproductive” by Lincoln. This, in turn, reveals the president’s conspicuous desire to bar the further exacerbation of the looming issue of secession. In brief, two major standpoints comprise Lincoln’s stand on his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861.
Generally-speaking, the posed quotation illustrates how the North and South alike, though embracing diverging standpoints, were constantly united with one another, from a geographical standpoint. In further elaboration upon this reality, noteworthy landforms, whether it be Mississippi River or Appalachian Mountains, failed to geographically divide the localities, hence the reason why Lincoln regarded the North and South as “Siamese twins, bound inseparably together”. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “If they [North and South] had been divided by the Pyrenees or Danube River, a sectional divorce might have been more feasible. But the Appalachian Mountains and the mighty Mississippi River both ran the wrong way” (Cohen & Kennedy 421). The quote above exemplifies an inevitable relationship that existed between the North and South alike, in that they remained geographically bound to one another. To add to this, it additionally reflects upon a key reason, as to why Lincoln commonly regarded the act of secession as outrightly unproductive. In brief, it can most definitely be stated that Lincoln’s assertion was laden with a large array of veritable sentiments. From a broad perspective, the numerous issues that could have potentially complemented uncontested secession entailed the South’s share of debt, the allotment of federal territories to the Confederate States of America, and the resolution of the fugitive-slave law, among others. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “What share of the national debt should the South be forced to take with it? What portion of the jointly held federal territories, if any, should the Confederate states be allotted? How would the fugitive-slave issue be resolved? Was it conceivable that all such problems could have been solved without ugly armed clashes?” (Cohen & Kennedy 421). The quote above depicts the thought-provoking questions that surrounded the act of secession. To add to this, such a conspicuous degree of uncertainty furthermore stirred the North’s opposition to the South’s threatening withdrawal from the Union. In brief, a large array of repercussions would be yielded, thanks to uncontested secession. Generally-speaking, Lincoln rather ingeniously handled the problem with Fort Sumter by outrightly declaring that he would dispatch an expedition, in order to “provision”, though not “reinforce”, the fort. In further elaboration upon this reality, the South warily suspected that the region was potentially a victim of the North’s act of chicanery. Evidence from the text that further bulwarks this claim is shown when the authors state, “On April 12, 1861, the cannon …show more content…
Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “Lincoln promptly issued a call to the states for seventy-five thousand militiamen, and volunteers sprang to the colors in such enthusiastic numbers that many were turned away-a mistake that was not often repeated” (Cohen & Kennedy 423). The quote above reflects upon the sprightly, jaunty eagerness that thrived among the northerners, upon the rendered opportunity of engaging in combat against the South. Further complementing this posed notion, the large influx of volunteers furthermore reveals the primary reason behind why several individuals were altogether denied entry into the army. In brief, an exuberant response captures the essence of Lincoln’s offer to enlist in the Union
Generally-speaking, the posed quotation illustrates how the North and South alike, though embracing diverging standpoints, were constantly united with one another, from a geographical standpoint. In further elaboration upon this reality, noteworthy landforms, whether it be Mississippi River or Appalachian Mountains, failed to geographically divide the localities, hence the reason why Lincoln regarded the North and South as “Siamese twins, bound inseparably together”. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “If they [North and South] had been divided by the Pyrenees or Danube River, a sectional divorce might have been more feasible. But the Appalachian Mountains and the mighty Mississippi River both ran the wrong way” (Cohen & Kennedy 421). The quote above exemplifies an inevitable relationship that existed between the North and South alike, in that they remained geographically bound to one another. To add to this, it additionally reflects upon a key reason, as to why Lincoln commonly regarded the act of secession as outrightly unproductive. In brief, it can most definitely be stated that Lincoln’s assertion was laden with a large array of veritable sentiments. From a broad perspective, the numerous issues that could have potentially complemented uncontested secession entailed the South’s share of debt, the allotment of federal territories to the Confederate States of America, and the resolution of the fugitive-slave law, among others. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “What share of the national debt should the South be forced to take with it? What portion of the jointly held federal territories, if any, should the Confederate states be allotted? How would the fugitive-slave issue be resolved? Was it conceivable that all such problems could have been solved without ugly armed clashes?” (Cohen & Kennedy 421). The quote above depicts the thought-provoking questions that surrounded the act of secession. To add to this, such a conspicuous degree of uncertainty furthermore stirred the North’s opposition to the South’s threatening withdrawal from the Union. In brief, a large array of repercussions would be yielded, thanks to uncontested secession. Generally-speaking, Lincoln rather ingeniously handled the problem with Fort Sumter by outrightly declaring that he would dispatch an expedition, in order to “provision”, though not “reinforce”, the fort. In further elaboration upon this reality, the South warily suspected that the region was potentially a victim of the North’s act of chicanery. Evidence from the text that further bulwarks this claim is shown when the authors state, “On April 12, 1861, the cannon …show more content…
Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “Lincoln promptly issued a call to the states for seventy-five thousand militiamen, and volunteers sprang to the colors in such enthusiastic numbers that many were turned away-a mistake that was not often repeated” (Cohen & Kennedy 423). The quote above reflects upon the sprightly, jaunty eagerness that thrived among the northerners, upon the rendered opportunity of engaging in combat against the South. Further complementing this posed notion, the large influx of volunteers furthermore reveals the primary reason behind why several individuals were altogether denied entry into the army. In brief, an exuberant response captures the essence of Lincoln’s offer to enlist in the Union