Parsons begins his writing with a recounting of his experience as a freshman professor. He claims to be impressed by his student’s willingness to learn. However, the first paragraph becomes increasingly pompous and dismissive of how students hay have been taught to …show more content…
Parsons seems almost eager to separate himself from high school teachers, asserting, “I am your professor, not your teacher. There is a difference." Aside from being slightly aggressive in tone, this statement immediately draws the line between Parsons’ ideas on two very different types of education. He goes on to explain that while “teachers” are obligated to ensure that their students are learning (apparently motivated by nothing more than keeping their job), as a professor, “It is no part of [his] job to make [students] learn." Parsons then employs the stale metaphor of leading his students to the, “fountain of knowledge." Why should Parsons, or any other professor for that matter, care if a student learns? They will not be penalized for it, so really, what is the