Juvenile Offenders In The Criminal Justice System

Great Essays
Juvenile offenders are becoming a significant concern for all professionals within the criminal justice system. Juveniles cannot lead a successful life when they have been a part of criminal activity and have not been rehabilitated. These individuals are the future or our country and of the world. When they have gotten involved in illegal activity it is less likely that they will have a positive impact on society. By using illegal substances, there are more individuals affected than just the offender. Families, schools, and communities are all affected by juvenile drug use. So, with the development of alternatives such as juvenile drug courts, it is clear that the criminal justice system has taken a serious look at improving the lives of these …show more content…
Drug use has, however, evolved over the years. In the 1980’s crack cocaine made its appearance onto the scene, and the number of individuals arrested for drug possession was exponential. Shockingly, this type of offense is the most prevalent type of offense within the United States of America. So, when it comes to the overwhelming number of these types of offenders, there is not a difference on how they are processed through the criminal justice system. The issue that presents itself is the fact that most of these drug-related offenses are not considered serious, therefore, by incarcerating these individuals, means that the prison systems population is rising. Therefore, when thinking of juvenile offenders, they do not need to be placed into this environment. Even though it may have once been socially acceptable to punish juveniles to the fullest extent of the law, this is no longer the case. The rehabilitative era is among us, and the policies and procedures that are embedded within the various juvenile drug court models are exemplary ways restorative justice is occurring (Egbert, Church, & Byrnes, 2006; Gaudio, …show more content…
Each drug court has different types of requirements for entry into the program, stipulations that must be fulfilled during the program, as well as completion of the program. Also, each drug court is different in how the treatment services are offered to the youth; this can be based on a number of variables such as monetary resources, staffing, and outreach resources. Therefore, while each drug court may vary slightly, the overall goal is still the same, to keep the youth of this county out of prison, to teach them the skills to have a successful crime-free life, to stay clean, and to not re-offend. Additionally, alternate research has in fact shown that juvenile drug courts reduce the behaviors associated with drug use, as well as criminality. So, this restorative justice system that is available for juveniles enables the justice system to maintain its goals, while also facilitating a treatment policy type program to overall engage in various goals such as potential career development, career opportunities, counseling, family therapy, etc. (Egbert, Church, & Byrnes,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sharon’s drug addiction began at the age of 22. She started drinking alcohol at parties, not thinking of its future consequences. Drugs soon replaced the alcohol and began using marijuana. She thought it of no harm to her because she did not consider it a “hard” drug like cocaine or morphine. Although she swore to herself to never use such drugs, Sharon soon started using crack cocaine to deal with her personal and family problems.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Drug Courts

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The evidence is clear that drug courts can increase an offender’s contact to treatment. Numerous drug court evaluation have found, on average, more than half of offenders participating in the program completed at least one year; most of which continue on to graduate from it. This compare favorably to community based drug treatment programs in which, on average, more than three quarters of attendees drop out within the first year.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juvenile and family drug courts also supply “a structure allowing for the ongoing, active participation and oversight of a judge” (Devon, 2010). Supplying juveniles with treatment and services for drug abuse, providing valuable support to help them in opposing future offenses, supporting them to accomplish in schools and build positive communal relationships, and assisting them in developing skills that will aid in having fruitful lives without crimes and drugs are the goals of juvenile drug courts (Devon, 2010). Family drug courts have similar goals. The only distinction is that family drug courts also assist parents in coming to be personally, financially and emotionally self-sufficient, and in cultivating productive parenting skills (Devon, 2010). As of December 31, 2004, there were 153 family drug courts in 33 States and the District of Columbia (D.C.) (Devon,…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Courts

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specialized courts have been instrumental in deviating the impact of overpopulated and taxed prison systems. Accordingly, they provide an environment that allows drug abusers to correct their behavior and lessen recidivism for similar crimes (Drug Courts, n.d.). The advantage of having a drug courts improve the treatment an offender gets and allows them to take charge over the positive changes in their day-to-day lives. The National Institute of Justice has found that recidivism rates drop significantly around 17%-26% depending of the programs used and assignment of judges over the length of time done (Do Drug Courts Work? Findings From Drug Court Research, n.d.).…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCoy (2010) demonstrates that drug courts was established to prevent drug-related crime, help individuals get off using drugs, and help addicts become normal United States citizens. Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) argues “[…] their potential to reduce incarceration lies in their impact on recidivism, leading to fewer future cases on which long periods of incarceration might otherwise have been imposed” (Rempel, Green and Kralstein, 2012, p.190). Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) demonstrated that the drug court intervention should not be considered for an alternative to incarceration, right away because this based on their findings, more research needs to be conducted to further provide evidence. Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) argues “[…] that although slight increases in substance use prevalence may not precipitate immediate changes in criminal behavior it may induce later increases in crime” (Sullivan and Hamilton, 2007, p.514). Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) demonstrates that there tends to be a gradual decline in criminal behavior leading to a decrease in substance…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance Abuse Treatment in the Juvenile Justice System Juvenile offenders have a high rate of substance use. Upon arrival to a correctional facility after being detained, approximately 56% of boys and 40% of girls tested positive for drugs. Most of these youth test positively for marijuana or cocaine, but many are addicted to many more substances. The DSM-V defines a substance-use disorder as “a maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress…” classified by encompassing 2 or more of 11 different criteria from the manual. By effectively treating substance-use disorders, the juvenile justice system can: a) stop the offender from committing the criminal act of drug use itself and b) decrease recidivism rates of juvenile offenders by truly treating them instead of perpetuating them to become a product of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 100 years ago, the juvenile justice system was established in order to divert youthful offenders from the courts harsh punishments which has long lasting effects. The juvenile justice system focused and encouraged rehabilitation based on a juveniles individual needs. This system created for minors was to differ from those of the adult courts in a number of ways. Instead of focusing on the criminal act that had brought the juvenile offender into the court room in the first place, this system was designed to focus on the minor or juvenile as a person who was in need of assistance.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Running head: ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS 1 ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS 3 Adolescent Offenders Thomas J. McCarthy Grand Canyon University: PCN-535 May 24, 2017 Cultural Influence Of the total juvenile offenders arrested, about one half of them have substance use disorders. (What role can the juvenile justice system play in addressing adolescent drug abuse?, 2014) But being youthful offenders, these adolescents are lucky because if they were adults they would do jail time; especially during the 1970s and the Nelson Rockefeller Drug Laws. The Rockefeller Drug Laws prosecuted adults with at least two ounces of drug possession with major sentences. (Gray, 2009) Thank God today, even though there are still remnants of the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Drug Court is a successful option for many addict offenders. The Drug Court program focuses on rehabilitation for the root of offenders problems. Unlike regular probation, Drug Court allows the offender to have a more focused experience in the court system. Drug Court requires the participants to test negative on a urinalysis report weekly and also to participate in AA/NA groups or other recovery self-help groups. Through Drug Court, offenders are treated with the expectation of treatment being the main goal and motivation, not punishment for the offender’s discretions (Marlowe and Meyer, 2011).…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jjdp Research Paper

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act also known as (JJDPA) was established in 1974 and has been revised several times over the past thirty years. It provides crucial support for state programs that assist communities to take a comprehensive approach to juvenile crime prevention and to address the needs of vulnerable youth and those of their families early and effectively. The JJDPA supports delinquency prevention programs to improve state and local juvenile justice systems and the juvenile planning and advisory system in all states; and operation of the Justice Department’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) dedicated to training, technical assistance, model program development, research and evaluation, and support of state and local efforts. Its reauthorization is currently more than seven years overdue. Since the last major reauthorization of the JJDPA nearly two decades ago, much more is known about what works and does not work to keep our communities safe and put youth on a better path.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was noted, that there was an increasing amount of juveniles being punished for alcohol and drug usage without treatment. The article advocated a need for a juvenile drug court in Southern Arizona based on the increasing availability of drugs going through the state which has led to more apprehension of suspects essentially juveniles. The purpose of the drug courts is to provide external help rather than the punishment in the juvenile court system. “The PCJC provided (a) initial screening of youth and subsequent referrals to treatment (as appropriate), (b) intensive judicial contact, (c) urinalysis testing for substance use, (d) weekly court hearings, (e) community service opportunities, and (f) school interventions/contacts” (Ruiz, B. S., et. al.,…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Studies of drug use among youth involved in the juvenile justice system indicate high levels of abuse. Since 1990, the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program conducted by the National Institute of Justice has measured substance abuse among male detainees/arrestees in 12 jurisdictions across the country. Like the data from the Monitoring the Future study, the DUF data show increases in illicit drug use by youth in nearly all sites between 1993 and 1995. In 1995, youth testing positive for at least one drug ranged from 19 percent in Portland, OR, to 58 percent in Washington, D.C. DUF data, which do not include information on alcohol use by juveniles, showed in 1995 that the illicit drug most frequently used by delinquent youth was marijuana (National…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of juvenile offenders presents a unique problem for systems of criminal punishments and deterrence. An additional layer of complexity is added when we consider repeat juvenile offenders.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays