Justifiable War Research Paper

Improved Essays
There is not any other instance of decision-making which is more pivotal and unfortunate than the choice of an authoritative power to go on a war and utilize its military force against its supposed enemies. But in the most obvious cases, these choices are likewise troublesome. Subsequently, the concept of justifiable war should be appropriately assessed and evaluated by the authoritative entities in light of human rights enforcement. The directions regarding the modernized concept of the justifiable war include the choice of being engaged in a war and the methodology of exercising the military force. The last arrangement of prerequisites concentrates on proportional assessment of the amount of military force that would be utilized, a comprehensive focus in order to …show more content…
Furthermore, the anticipated advantages must exceed the anticipated expenses and wastage in a long-term manner with an exclusive focus to establish the human rights. The hypothesis additionally contends that every one of the criteria should be available before a war can be regarded justifiable and henceforth embraced. The hypothesis of justifiable or reasonable war, without a doubt, contends that wars might be fought when there is no other choice for an entity to protect its sovereignty, freedom, the rights of citizens, and the safety of the nation as a means of extreme necessity. It suggests that the wars should be fought when the circumstances created by an external authority undermine the most crucial interests of a nation and do not at all encourage the contrasting options to utilize power. For example, WWII compelled a number of nations to go to war in order to maintain their freedom and preserve the basic rights of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    War Powers Constraints have undermined International Law Constraints on the Use of Force, that no formal U.S. declarations of war have been made by Congress before Presidents took action in international conflicts. Ranging from Korea to Iraq and Afghanistan, every action was taken unilaterally, meaning directly by one person, in this case the president, in order to allow US military intervention (Hathaway, n.d.). In this piece and others similar, Hathaway also discusses the decline of congressional power and the gain of presidential power, stating that as Congress has allowed the president to use executive orders and immediate response to involvement in global conflicts, we have become a nation based around “self-defense” instead of “just cause” (Boylan & Kedrowski, 2004; Fisher, n.d.; Hathaway, n.d.). One of the prime examples of War Powers literature comes from the 1973 War Powers Resolution passed by Congress (Rep. Zablocki, 1973). As Vietnam was winding down, Congress sought to prevent other divisive wars with US involvement, Congress must be consulted within 48 hours if military action is…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agent Orange Vietnam War

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War is a period of time in which lines between right and wrong are blurred. When you’re up against a claimed enemy, the cost of their lives is the price you must pay in order to further your goal. Sometimes we don’t always know what consequences will follow our actions, but in this case, the price of war has followed on throughout generations and generations of people. Leaving a lasting effect on not only the claimed “enemies” but also on them as well.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay, three reasons from the Just War Theory will be used to outline the vindication of the war; they are legitimate authority, possessing right intention, and reasonable chance of…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the fourth edition of Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer, Walzer discusses the crime, logic, rules, morals of soldiers, and finally the war convention. As discussed in the previous reading, Holsti also addresses the logic and war convention that must take place at the end of each war in order to ensure more satisfaction between the two sides in battle. Waltzer states that is is possible to fight a just war unjustly and for an unjust war to be fought in strict accordance to the laws of war. The author throughout this reading talks about how war is a crime. Walzer asks, "why is it wrong to start a war?”…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From its earliest time, human history recounts wars among its civilizations. Wars were, and still are, typically accompanied by arguments for and against waging them. Many have justified war; many have lamented its consequences. It is said that war is a part of an effort to eradicate it all together someday, or that it is an inevitable part of life. War is a difficult subject to explain.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The pursuit of national interest is always in the formula for the calculations of the rational decisions made by a nation. National interest is something each nation is thinking about when they go into war. World War I was the sacrifice of millions of lives to fulfill each nation’s national interest. William Kirby argues that, countries enter war because of their “rational calculations and national interests”. The source points out how the purpose of war is not irrational, it is rationalized by the beliefs of a nation and the benefits of military conflict.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jus In Bello Analysis

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He argues that “the close-quarters conditions of asymmetric war, widespread civilian participation, the inability to distinguish combatants from noncombatants, and the prospect that each side can adopt tactics without fear of ‘payment in kind’” (Gross 233) has led belligerent to adopt a different paradigm in modern warfare. Such paradigm Gross examines include use of nonlethal weapons and targeted killings, which are debatable under just war tradition regarding their adherence to the major jus in bello principles. Therefore, instead of applying jus in bello principles, Gross categorizes such activities to be justifiable, excusable and neither, which is an exceptionalism method of examining war actions. A justifiable action vindicates the aggressor’s rights without violating the victim’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going To War Justifiable

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are a lot of instances where nations or leaders make the decision to go to war, but only some cases are justifiable. A nation can be justified in going to war for many reasons, such as territorial disputes and financial issues. Also, a war could be a continuation of a previous war. If there has already been tension between nations from past conflict, that could very well lead to a war.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who Won The Vietnam War

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War has ended the persecution of other for centuries. The importance of war is shown by the freedom of those around you and abroad. Without war countries would be nothing but colonies, ruled by a more powerful nation with an iron fist. Different races would no longer exist because nothing would be done to help them. War is what keeps tyranny and persecution in check.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Through the existence of humans—and their evolution of civilization—war has been an unavoidable action. Throughout time, blood has been shed, cries have been shouted, and conflict has soared with some plummeting; however, the powers of war have been a long lasting concern on the social, political, and even moral levels. That most climacteric issue of war power to researchers, political scientists, and social scientists is the dilemma of who should have the power to bring a nation to war. More specifically to America, who should have the conclusive voice to bring the United States of America to a position of war with other parts of the world—Congress or the Commander in Chief?…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Many understand the fact that war is rarely ever justifiable and that the idea…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, 'Come!' 4Then another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make people kill each other. To him was given a large sword. " (Revelation 6.9-15) Few concepts are better known to humanity than war.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2. I believe that there are a few reasons a war would be considered just. A fight for freedom and independence from a tyrannical government that is oppressing its people would be a valid reason to wage war. I also…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology,…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays