Junk Food Tax Analysis

According to Ekoyan G author of “A history of obesity, or how what was good became ugly and then bad.”, “Obesity wasn't a problem until the 19th century when America was making more food options rather than just to live on and people were taking advantage of the system” (4). Back before food was as plentiful, being fat was a prime character because it demonstrated that one had a great deal of money and was part of royalty. Now a day being obese is looked down upon because they look different, but it also comes with negative health issues that can result in death and lower longevity. Obesity is not the reason why people die, it's the effects of heart disease is what kills people that are side effects of obesity. According to Maggie Fox author of “HeavyBurden: Obesity may be even deadlier than thought”, “In addition, hundreds of thousands of deaths happen every year because of obesity and “a controversial new study that suggests obesity accounts of about 18 percent of all deaths in the United States” (1). …show more content…
Staff states, ever since a junk food tax was thought about it was typically not an ideal plan thus it was commonly denied by the public even when there was research done illustrating benefits (1). Eventually, people started to modify to the idea, but the soda companies were starting to realize what the soda tax could do this thus they set precautions such as endorsing influential people and putting them on commercials. As the large soda brands continue their pursuit, it continues to make it harder for the right junk food tax to be introduced correctly. Sarah Boseley herself writes, which would be at least a 20% increase because researchers found that it would be enough to slow down obesity by a respectable amount