Both authors weave together the statement that the heart is incredibly complex, yet fragile. Franzen uses his personal view on love to suggest readers to get involved and meet real people, and to cast aside and ignore the various dangers of love. He embraced love, and found it “easier, not harder, …show more content…
Doyle starts his story off with talking about hummingbirds, bringing out the poetic aspect of all things science. He compares the hummingbird’s heart to that of a blue whale, then to a tortoise, finally bringing out that there is “so much held in heart” (Doyle 143), yet in the end , the heart will be alone, no matter how many people it lets in, for a naked heart would be too exposed and bare. Franzen uses his own passion for nature and birds, saying that loving something is entirely selfless, and it can hurt, that “[love] became a portal to an important, less self-centered part of [him] that [he] had never known existed” (Franzen