War can result from failure of states to resolve their disputes by diplomatic means. The US uses the national instrument of power to keep the leadership position in the world. “As a nation, the US wages war employing all instruments of national power—diplomatic, informational, military, and economic. The President employs the Armed Forces of the United States to achieve national strategic objectives.” US military helps the executive to use correctly the “M “of the DIME. The ability of the US military to work with the department of defense DOD and interagency partners. This offers a clear advantage. To illustrate, All Service components contribute their distinct capabilities to the joint force “The capacity of the Armed Forces of the United States to work as a cohesive joint team is a key advantage in any operational environment” The effectiveness of the joint forces depends on the interoperability between forces, and this will be more effective with a common doctrine that connects the strategy with operational and tactical decisions. Furthermore, The DOD have developed the joint doctrine. And the “purpose of the joint doctrine is to enhance the operational effectiveness of joint forces by offering fundamental principles that guide the employment of US military forces toward a common objective.” Multinational operations also need common doctrinal language. For this reason, much of the information and guidance supported unified action and joint operations apply to multinational operations. Nonetheless, reaching “unity of effort through the unity of command for a multinational operation may not be politically possible, but it should be a goal.” Thus, the above shows the complexity of joint operations and multinational cooperation with NGOs and government institutions. Also, makes clear the need to rely on common language to allow the link between services and nations to achieve the military objectives attached to the joint forces. Nevertheless, the joint forces have their capacities and limitations as a joint force, additionally each service works independently per the domain in which they perform. “joint forces require high levels of interoperability and systems that are conceptualized and designed with joint architectures and acquisition strategies” Then, each service must cooperate in the domain that corresponds to the development of unit effort to reduce the weaknesses and strengthen joint capacities. The joint forces must integrate and synchronize operations in such a manner as to apply force from different dimensions to shock, disrupt, and defeat opponents. Selecting the right mix of forces to reach the desired end state is more challenging today than ever before. Joint Forces Commanders JFC must consider the capabilities and limitations of each service. The understanding of the different services and their capabilities offers the ability to apply force from different dimensions. The shortcomings of the joint forces are because of the reduction of
War can result from failure of states to resolve their disputes by diplomatic means. The US uses the national instrument of power to keep the leadership position in the world. “As a nation, the US wages war employing all instruments of national power—diplomatic, informational, military, and economic. The President employs the Armed Forces of the United States to achieve national strategic objectives.” US military helps the executive to use correctly the “M “of the DIME. The ability of the US military to work with the department of defense DOD and interagency partners. This offers a clear advantage. To illustrate, All Service components contribute their distinct capabilities to the joint force “The capacity of the Armed Forces of the United States to work as a cohesive joint team is a key advantage in any operational environment” The effectiveness of the joint forces depends on the interoperability between forces, and this will be more effective with a common doctrine that connects the strategy with operational and tactical decisions. Furthermore, The DOD have developed the joint doctrine. And the “purpose of the joint doctrine is to enhance the operational effectiveness of joint forces by offering fundamental principles that guide the employment of US military forces toward a common objective.” Multinational operations also need common doctrinal language. For this reason, much of the information and guidance supported unified action and joint operations apply to multinational operations. Nonetheless, reaching “unity of effort through the unity of command for a multinational operation may not be politically possible, but it should be a goal.” Thus, the above shows the complexity of joint operations and multinational cooperation with NGOs and government institutions. Also, makes clear the need to rely on common language to allow the link between services and nations to achieve the military objectives attached to the joint forces. Nevertheless, the joint forces have their capacities and limitations as a joint force, additionally each service works independently per the domain in which they perform. “joint forces require high levels of interoperability and systems that are conceptualized and designed with joint architectures and acquisition strategies” Then, each service must cooperate in the domain that corresponds to the development of unit effort to reduce the weaknesses and strengthen joint capacities. The joint forces must integrate and synchronize operations in such a manner as to apply force from different dimensions to shock, disrupt, and defeat opponents. Selecting the right mix of forces to reach the desired end state is more challenging today than ever before. Joint Forces Commanders JFC must consider the capabilities and limitations of each service. The understanding of the different services and their capabilities offers the ability to apply force from different dimensions. The shortcomings of the joint forces are because of the reduction of