Egoism can easily make people to consider about the relationship by profit and loss, which directly relates with money. As the utilitarianism works for the most of people, not all of the people, it compels with collectivism. However, I think to see the level of the pleasure would be better to think of the number of people who gets benefit. People can be grouped by more detailed purpose, and by this diversity, each group would eventually get advantages but for the small part, not like one gets everything and other gets
Egoism can easily make people to consider about the relationship by profit and loss, which directly relates with money. As the utilitarianism works for the most of people, not all of the people, it compels with collectivism. However, I think to see the level of the pleasure would be better to think of the number of people who gets benefit. People can be grouped by more detailed purpose, and by this diversity, each group would eventually get advantages but for the small part, not like one gets everything and other gets