John Rawls And John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

Improved Essays
John Rawls is an Egalitarian, which is someone that stresses the importance of equal access and opportunity to primary goods, such as shelter and education. They believe that the income gap in today’s world should be reduced to the extent that justice is present in society; this requires all people to have a fair opportunity to fulfill their fundamental needs. Rawls argues that people can distributive justice can be obtained if everyone obtains basic liberties and fair equality of opportunity. Rawls theory that no person should be either granted or denied social benefits based on circumstances for which they are not responsible is supported through his first and second principle of justice. The first principle of justice has a strong emphasis …show more content…
Rawls states, “inequalities as defined by the institutional structure…are arbitrary unless it is reasonable to expect that they will work out to everyone’s advantage” (225). The first part of this principle specifies that social and economic inequalities, if they are to exist, are to benefit the least-advantaged members of society, which is the difference principle. An example that was provided in class was that you are allowed to make as much money as you want as long as you are helping benefit the least advantaged because it is only a just society if people are not without a home and basic rights. This principle rests heavily on social institutions being organized so that inequalities of wealth will specifically be the greatest advantage to those worse off. A specific example that further supports Rawls theory of justice would be Whole Foods Market; a multimillion-dollar company that helps to benefit the least advantaged. Whole Foods makes the effort to focus on working with people to help create economic prosperity in emerging economies. On a local scale, all 431 stores donate food to shelters as well as food banks within their area to help out since they have plenty they are able to provide. There are also a few times throughout the year that the stores have community-giving days where five percent of the net sales that day are donated to either an educational organization or a local nonprofit. Each year, Whole Foods’ community giving surpasses five percent of their total net profit and their average net income over the past five years has been around five hundred million dollars, which would be an average of two million and five hundred thousand dollars they give back. On top of the money they donate and food they give, their employees are also constantly volunteering their time to nonprofits within their community. Whole

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Health Care

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The world is naturally unfair. The role of government is to reduce natural inequality while preserving liberty. According to Rawls an unequal medical structure would be just only if the poor were better off under that system than the current. He emphasizes that this does not apply to the current American medical system. He also argues that congress opposed the current Medicare program as it was at the time considered socialized medicine.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is mass incarceration? Mass incarceration is the increase of people incarcerated in the United States prisons. America has a very high number of people incarcerated compared to other countries. This causes many problems and crime rates are still high. I do not believe John Rawls would agree with mass incarceration because it is not beneficial in some aspects and it goes against the veil of ignorance in certain ways.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These people would not see the need to take advantage of others for their benefit because that would not be a rational decision. In fact, disadvantages would be detrimental to Rawl’s theory of social justice because it interfers with the idea that individual needs should be addressed. Similar to the capacity theory, Rawl’s assumption for a just society aligns well with Sen’s theory on evaluating individual…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This allows no one person to be advantaged or disadvantaged. Therefore, the less fortunate would have the same chance as someone that is more fortunate. John Rawls thought that the first virtue of social institutions should be justice. He developed two principles to apply to situations to say if they were just or unjust. This theory applies to this case because the only reason that the judge is even considering sterilizing Sally is for the reason that she is disabled.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Rousseau 108). Within the first principle of justice, Rawls looks to promote the same principals as Rousseau. They each see the importance of having equal basic liberties for each individual. For Rousseau, equality promotes a political community that protects individuals from problems found in commercial society. For Rawls, equality is central to the fairness and justice that he looks to emphasize.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, it should be endowment-insensitive, so the circumstances or background of people shouldn’t be regarded, and ambition-sensitive, where one’s choices are significant. Therefore, Rawls’ is against the welfare state because he believes that inequality is justified if it isn’t due to prejudice or discrimination and a person is in control of the decisions which affect the quality of their…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By creating an advantage for oneself, the disadvantage for other people comes back as a disadvantage to that person too, since everyone is in the same situation. John Rawl 's Principle of Justice is the two part principle in Socail Contract Theory that expands the definition of the Social Contract such that it does not focus on moral rules as much as it focuses on rights and liberties. This clause of the Principle of Justice states that everyone in the community may make claims to certain rights as long as everyone may have the same claim to these rights. The second part of the principle, was added to address how social and economic inequalities may be morally acceptable. Inequalities may be justified if the following two conditions are satisfied: the first is every member of the community must have the same chance at improving his or her economic or social position.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, another important element of this system is that they serve and support their local and global communities. Each of the Whole Food stores donates food to area food banks and shelters and also several times a year they have community giving days where they give 5% of that days net sales to local non-profit organizations. This system is all about giving back to their community and helping them to grow and be nourished. In a Whole Foods Market system, it works and makes their company better through balancing and reinforcing loops.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the piece, “justice as fairness” serves as the basis for the liberal approach to citizenship: Justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice. While a political conception of justice is, of course a moral conception… justice as fairness framed to apply to what I have called the ‘basic structure’ of a modern constitutional democracy. By this structure I mean such a society’s main political, social, and economic institutions, and how they fit together into one unified system of social cooperation. In other words, Rawls believes that a democracy will most efficiently function when each citizen develops their own moral conception of justice and go on to agreeably pursue these conceptions through diverse plans of action.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays