The Annexation of Texas caused great contempt and division among Americans, and arguments defending both sides were abundant. John O’Sullivan’s argument for the Annexation of Texas is superior compared to Thomas Corwin’s argument. O’Sullivan utilizes facts, the spirit of America, the antithesis, and the history of other foreign countries in America make a strong argument. O’Sullivan begins by declaring that Texas belongs to America. Texas is no longer a mere plot of land; it is American (O’Sullivan 1). He goes on to explain the process of obtaining Texas with facts about the Mexican revolution/resistance (O’Sullivan 2). The author shows how the independence of Texas was unquestionable through objective facts. It is difficult to deny and oppose
…show more content…
The author mentions England and France. O’Sullivan reminds Americans how England and France were foreign interferences at one point (O’Sullivan 2). He then questions why the United States does not realize that the Annexation is a similar situation. If that is the case, no American should be opposed to the Annexation of Texas because Americans should have already learned that American land belongs to Americans and not foreigners. Corwin, on the other hand, solely focuses on the emotional and moral aspect of the argument. He asks Americans to consider the Mexicans and African-American slaves (Corwin 1-2). Even though his words are moving, they are not backed up with very many facts or objective reasoning. Corwin asks people to consider the wellbeing of others, but he does not take into account that Americans are also concerned about themselves and their nation. O’Sullivan’s argument is more solid and sound than Corwin’s attempt. O’Sullivan uses facts, the spirit of America, the antithesis, and Americas past relationships with foreign countries to present a strong argument. The Annexation of Texas was a very controversial matter in America, but people like John O’Sullivan and even Thomas Corwin were able to make a write these arguments that in the end helped change the course of American
The author mentions England and France. O’Sullivan reminds Americans how England and France were foreign interferences at one point (O’Sullivan 2). He then questions why the United States does not realize that the Annexation is a similar situation. If that is the case, no American should be opposed to the Annexation of Texas because Americans should have already learned that American land belongs to Americans and not foreigners. Corwin, on the other hand, solely focuses on the emotional and moral aspect of the argument. He asks Americans to consider the Mexicans and African-American slaves (Corwin 1-2). Even though his words are moving, they are not backed up with very many facts or objective reasoning. Corwin asks people to consider the wellbeing of others, but he does not take into account that Americans are also concerned about themselves and their nation. O’Sullivan’s argument is more solid and sound than Corwin’s attempt. O’Sullivan uses facts, the spirit of America, the antithesis, and Americas past relationships with foreign countries to present a strong argument. The Annexation of Texas was a very controversial matter in America, but people like John O’Sullivan and even Thomas Corwin were able to make a write these arguments that in the end helped change the course of American