James Gregory’s, American Exodus, is a book that focuses on Dust Bowl migration to California, and their economic and social struggles in California. The book first starts off setting up the historical context of the Dust Bowl and the migrants with statistics, maps, pictures, and migrant backgrounds in the introduction. The overall book reads like a history textbook on the Dust Bowl, which is divided into two parts instead of narrative based on one family like The Grapes of Wrath. The first part of the book is organized chronologically, focusing on the resettlement of the Dust Bowlers, and the second part is done thematically and focuses on Okie culture. Gregory’s approach successfully showed the clash of cultures and social struggles the migrants faced in California accurately without having to caricaturize the migrants.…
This proves to be another part of the rising action that leads to Tom Joad to split off from the family and start rallying the starving workers to get more workers'…
(126) The gas station attendant’s assumption that the Joads have come to beg deeply offends Tom, showing that Oklahoman migrants are determined to remain self-sufficient and don’t take kindly to being disrespected. In Chapter 26 the Joads drive past a police blockade and protesting groups of migrants. "These here is our own people, all of 'em," Tom said. "I don’ like this."…
He also suggests that instead of having the entire family migrate, the men should migrate during the crop season and the women and families should be left at home to work on their land. He stresses the importance of the care for the people who are in that line of work are treated. “To attempt to force them into a peonage of starvation and intimidated despair will be unsuccessful” (Steinbeck, pg.62). The way they are treated by society will determine how they act toward…
In The Death of Josseline, there are many conflicting world views. The author interviews and visits people with many different cultural backgrounds and views on immigration. These include border patrol agents, human rights activists, environmentalists, and the ranchers who live near the border. This conflict can be felt between these viewpoints all throughout the book. It gives the reader a clear perspective of what’s going on at the border.…
SYNTAX: The author switches back and forth between the Joad family and the migrant farmers in general. Quotations are used when the chapter is about the Joads. However, when it is about migrant farmers, Steinbeck does not put quotation marks. This is mostliekly he used these quotes to mean that any farmer in the nation oculd be saying that becasue they all share the same struggle. .…
People in the 1930’s pointed to the drought and dust as the cause of the hardship, but dust itself did not stomp all over the migrants, kill their families and starve their children. Dust would have been an vanquishable obstacle were it not for the greed shown to the migrants by the farmers in California. Through charity and cooperation, the migrants could have overcome the obstacles they faced in California. The migrants…
He believes that migrants were, “victims of the exploitative agriculture system: of tractors, one-crop specialization, tenant insecurity, disease, and soil abuse.” Where in contrast, Bonnifield he does not believe the migrants going to California were not…
In the book, the Joad family crosses the country to find work as farmhands when they are evicted from their Oklahoma farm. The Joads arrive in California to discover a land of unemployment and starvation. With no home to return to, the Joads move into a Hooverville where they continue to look for work. Hooverville teaches the small town farming family to be cunning, independent, and persistent. Despite the ensuing chaos and brutality, the family remains vigilant and works towards a future in California.…
It is completely mind-blowing to realize that the Dust Bowl actually happened in the United States not too long ago! The hardships that these families endured while living there, like losing their family farms and many of their belongings, is heart-breaking. What is even sadder is that the banks and government acted like they didn’t know who was to blame for the evicting! The social and economic issues of the 1930s were very problematic and the programs of the New Deal attempted to help get farmers back on track.…
The Charlottesville riots, threat of nuclear warfare, hurricane Harvey, and Donald Trump's presidency, are just some of this years occurrences that have news reporters busy and protesters livid. Many of them could be compared to John Steinbeck's novel “The Grapes of Wrath” in one way or another, but the one we are comparing is the protest to increase the pay of fast food workers. After reading “The Grapes of Wrath” and then reading the article from USA Today by Bruce Horovitz and Yamiche Alcindor named “Fast-food strikes widen into social-justice movement” it was clear that there was major comparisons that could be made. The book is based in the 1930s during a time when many of the farms in Oklahoma, Kansas, and northern Texas lost their crops to dust caused by windstorms.…
Many of these groups of people risked their lives to acquire wealth and prosperity in California. Foreigners left their homes or countries for economic, social, political, or cultural reasons to start a new…
These seekers had experienced a lack of quality of life and other problems, such as venereal disease, drug and alcohol abuse, and violence—“Claim jumpers,” which identified “men who robbed successful miners of their gold or stole their claim papers” (Gillon, pg.484). Moreover, racism was also one of the most significant problems that seekers had experienced. As mentioned to the foreign migrants, there were the undercurrents of tension among different races, for instance, “blatant forms of racism against the growing Chinese population” (Gillon, pg.485). Also, there was a conflict between the local and nonlocal populations in which these new people seized the local people’s lands and occupations for making their new future in California.…
For Francisco’s family, they were having an unstable job with low income, which they worked as a farmer picking up crop in a field, to maintain their lives standard. Every child in his family worked daily and couldn’t even acquire an opportunity to study. They came up with a situation which is taking risks and squeezing into a booming freedom country - the United States to continue their life. Their family was trying to get into California and seek a better job or fate. During the time that they were staying in the US, they were sent back to Mexico for several times with the same reason.…
Throughout United States history, there has been debate about immigration. From the bias against Irish immigrants in the 19th century to fear of Syrian refugees in the 2016 presidential debates, nativists have stood resolutely against migrants seeking better lives in a country citizens view as their own. This fear and possessiveness leads to bias and stereotyping of the groups coming into the United States at a particular period of time. In the 21st century, nativists have focused their fears on Latin American migrants, especially those crossing the border from Mexico, creating a “single story” (as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie illustrates in her Ted Talk, “The Danger of a Single Story”) describing them as lazy, delinquent people who take advantage…