The first chapter is titled Pre-rational and irrational medicine in Greece and neighbouring cultures, which is about how the medical kind of writing was established. Longrigg discusses how the Greeks’ have a popular belief in supernatural causation and/or cures of diseases. He goes against the idea that the Egyptians and Babylonians led the Greeks in the development of rational medicine.
The second chapter is titled Ionian natural philosophy and the origins of rational science. …show more content…
Longrigg discusses his belief that the treatment of Aristotle is rather symbolic. He argues that there is a problematic inconsistency in Aristotle’s description of the elements physical and biological works. Longrigg further argues that the discrepancy may be the result of the influence of the Hippocratic and Sicilian medical theories. Longrigg discusses different comparisons and contrasts with Plato. He also praises Aristotle’s outstanding achievement in the commencement of the practice of systematic animal dissection within the Lyceum. Longrigg goes on to argue that the physician Diocles was a contemporary of Aristotle and a major influence on his biological thought. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of the contact and similarity in view between Diocles and Praxagoras who was the teacher of two other physicians, Herophilus and