2007, p. 24), with Lee credited with ‘…put(ing) public relations on the right track…’ (Lattimore et al. 2007, p. 30), resulting in the ushering in of the Public Information model of public relations. An example of Lee’s new style of public relations practice was because of two train accidents in 1906. When the Pennsylvania Railroad suffered a train wreck, Lee, despite serious objections by his employers, tried openness, and transparency with the media, inviting them to the scene and proving facilities, expenses, and information all in aid of their interests over the railroads (Lattimore et al. 2007, p. 38; Newsom, Turk & Kruckeberg 2013, p. 33). Lee’s strategy was ‘…radical…’ (Newsom, Turk & Kruckeberg 2013, p. 33) at the time. However, Lee’s actions proved to be successful when New York Central suffered their own train wreck soon after, when the media reacted poorly to New York Central uncooperative behaviour compared to the Pennsylvania Railroad, which ‘…resulted in positive publicity, increased credibility, comparative advantages over the Central, and good, constructive press coverage and relations’ (Lattimore et al. 2007, p.
2007, p. 24), with Lee credited with ‘…put(ing) public relations on the right track…’ (Lattimore et al. 2007, p. 30), resulting in the ushering in of the Public Information model of public relations. An example of Lee’s new style of public relations practice was because of two train accidents in 1906. When the Pennsylvania Railroad suffered a train wreck, Lee, despite serious objections by his employers, tried openness, and transparency with the media, inviting them to the scene and proving facilities, expenses, and information all in aid of their interests over the railroads (Lattimore et al. 2007, p. 38; Newsom, Turk & Kruckeberg 2013, p. 33). Lee’s strategy was ‘…radical…’ (Newsom, Turk & Kruckeberg 2013, p. 33) at the time. However, Lee’s actions proved to be successful when New York Central suffered their own train wreck soon after, when the media reacted poorly to New York Central uncooperative behaviour compared to the Pennsylvania Railroad, which ‘…resulted in positive publicity, increased credibility, comparative advantages over the Central, and good, constructive press coverage and relations’ (Lattimore et al. 2007, p.