A Defense For Abortion Analysis

Improved Essays
Is abortion moral or immorally justified? Well, to understand abortion, let’s look at a particular situation that will help us answer this question. Mr and Mrs. Smith are struggling economically and have two children. They eventually, and unfortunately, find out that she is pregnant even though they were using contraception. Since they are not economically situated to have another baby, they decide to abort. Is their decision to have an abortion justified? I will argue that it is not justified for Mrs. Smith to have an abortion. To understand the case of abortion, we will have to look at both sides of the argument, the people who are for and against abortion. Judith Jarvis Thomson is for abortion and in his article, “A defense for abortion”, he clarifies why it is moral. His main argument is that …show more content…
To support his argument, he says that “it is wrong to kill us. Why it is wrong?” (Marquis p. 448). After consideration, he purposes the argument that killing someone, even you, is the greatest loss to the victim. “The loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise constituted one’s future” (Marquis P. 448). This implies to Mrs. smith because the fetus has a future. If she aborts the baby, that would be depriving the future activities of the fetus. Marquis gives a example to support the claim, it is wrong to only think killing beings that are human is wrong. What if there were aliens who visit us, since they don 't look like us they still have a valuable future. The reason that killing someone who has an “equal” valuable future like our, it is wrong to kill that being. However, the fetus is still the development of a human being. Which even increases the value of it. Since the fetus has a future like ours it is unjust to abort the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    You are ripping future possibilities from them. It is not right for us to live and rip that from them. They will not get to live a life they fully deserve. Marquis says that killing is one of the worst crimes within abortion and killing someone already living their life because it is killing their potential value of living further.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson depicts various scenarios in an effort to argue for the permissibility of abortion—in some cases—despite the consequential deprivation of someone else’s equal right to life. As part of her claim that every person has a right to life, she offers a scenario in which a famous violinist’s circulatory system has been plugged into an individual and is physically required to remain plugged in for 9 months. Thomson voices her claim by implying that although the fetus has a right to life as does the violinist, neither has the right to be maintained alive as the mother and the connected individual are not morally obliged to sit passively and remain plugged in. Notably, she defends her argument by recognizing that the scenario possibly…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe Vs. Wade

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abortion for another reason is completely immoral to me. I substantiate that life began in conception, without conception no person in the world would be born. The fetus stage is scientifically and natural part of an evolution of the human life cycle. Abortion is to terminate a human being in any stage of life, then abortion, ending a life of the fetus, is absolutely wrong. Killing is murder and murder are ethical absolutes.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many say that the baby has rights in addition to the mother; Thomson would say then a mother can remove a baby if they are unwelcomed and attempted to be prevented. While this is a very prominent topic of argumentation, it is controversial, and can even be hard to prove and explain a particular stance. Jarvis Thomson is one of the few who tries to make a case. Jarvis Thomson believes that abortion can be acceptable, but only under certain circumstances. She claims in that “Abortion is permissible when it’s to save the other’s life since it’s self defense.”…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The negative consequences to the birth of the fetus in each case outweighs the wrongness in the killing of the unborn child. For instance, look at a case of a fourteen-year-old girl who became pregnant due to rape. That fourteen-year-old girl did not ask to carry a child, nor did she want to have a child; this girl has lost the right to decide what happens to her body as she was forced to have sex. If she were to give birth to the child, she would lose out on the experiences and opportunities available to her before the unwanted pregnancy. Furthermore, it can be justified that an abortion would provide a better outcome for the mother than if she produced an unwanted child.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You are ending the potential of a human life.” I say malarkey. We could continue ask and ponder “What if?” What if the baby was going to become the next Mark Twain, Malala Yousafzai, or Maya Angelou? By giving into the belief of an unborn child’s potential, we have already given more rights to a fetus on what women can do with their body than the women themselves (Scott).…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Does the Constitution embrace a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?” (Oyez)Abortion is the termination of an unwanted pregnancy. This was the question asked during the trial of Roe v Wade, because Jane Roe wished to terminate her pregnancy even though Texas law prohibited it unless to save a mother’s life. According to the Supreme Court, the answer is yes. The Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 determined that a woman 's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment (Oyez).…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is one of the most controversial and heated issues in the United States today. There are two different views on this controversy. There are those who are pro-choice, whom believe that woman have the right to choose to have an abortion or not. Then, there are those who are pro-life, whom believe that a fetus should have right to life. Marry Warren, the author of “Abortion is Morally Permissible”, falls under the category of being pro-choice.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis is correct in that the harm in killing is that your depriving the person of all their future valuable experiences and they would have had these experiences ahead of them. Their future experiences are valuable because there instrumental goods, the things that lead us to other goods. There are also intrinsic goods and both good are lost if their killed. Also by aborting a fetus it is punishing an unborn child who committed no crime, which unethical since it was not justified. Another thing is since life begins as a fetus, abortion is like murder as it the act of depriving one of…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will defend my argument by explaining how a fetus is a human being and that abortion deprives the fetus from having its meaningful future. Lastly, I will respond to the objections of a fetus not being a human being, speciesism, and specific cases of genetic defects in a fetus. The first and main thing I must address is the phrase “human being.” We can all agree, that a fetus is a human being in the biological sense.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays