Interview Vs Interrogation

Improved Essays
Today, the fact that interviews and interrogations of criminal investigation contain more differences than similarities is being completely ignored. This lack of knowledge impedes us to recognize the important and worthwhile effort police officers make for our community on a daily basis. When conducting a criminal investigation, police officers must either perform an interview or an interrogation. Interviews and interrogations allow officers to detect lies and deception by displaying their fundamental methods, strategies, and techniques. These two different procedural communication techniques are being daily utilized by experts in the law enforcement field to obtain the truth in regards of suspects' innocence or guilt. Around the world, officers …show more content…
It is an accusatory conversation whose main point is to obtain as many information as possible. A criminal investigation interview is generally an interaction between police officers and witnesses or victims in an investigation, however, there will be times a suspect will be interviewed as well. The conversation can be between two or more people where questions are being asked by the interviewed to the interviewee. It is recommendable for an officer to always be friendly and non-confrontational. An interview is meant to figure out what the witness experienced. It allows officers to figure out what information the witness knows, what other witnesses might be found, and other important statements that may be helpful to the police. The same goes for interviewing a victim. In order to make a legal interview, the person who is being questioned must be willing to speak with an officer. The goal is to extract information from people who are willing or anxious to give you. When interviewing an individual, you are basically writing a script in your head of the whole process by making a bullet list of questions or points that you will be asking. Generally, challenging questions nor evidence is needed. Interviews should be leaded in a setting where your interviewee feels comfortable physically and psychologically with no consequences. It usually takes place on the scene. Furthermore, an interview can be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    . Another very important piece of policing that has also evolved with the times is police interrogation methods. An interrogation is when someone examines a suspect by questioning them formally. The biggest difference in interrogation methods used in the past compared to the more modern method is between the confrontational and non-confrontational methods. Confrontational interrogation, also known as the Reid Technique, is an aggressive way to obtain a confession.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is done by calling witnesses and introducing materials as evidence to support the charges. Each witness called for the Crown is asked questions by the Crown attorney. This is called direct examination or examination-in-chief. The defence is then given an opportunity to question the prosecutor's witness and present evidence favouring the accused.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    If they have had several run ins with the law in the past that is always brought up or their family members having prior issues with the police is mentioned as well to justify why the cop did what they did to the person. This can be dangerous because it…

    • 2770 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law enforcement interrogations are inquiries, in which criminal investigators systematically question potentially uncooperative individuals legally held in custody to attain dependable information that suspects may have knowledge of and potential responsibility for (Evans et al., 2010). Seasoned law enforcement interrogators (SLEIs) follow prescribed requirements in the course and conduct of the interrogation, but they also have extraordinary discretionary and flexible decision-making powers to use a variety of interrogation strategies and tools to fulfill their objectives in conducting dynamic adversarial interviews (Leo, 2008). Although substantial research has been conducted on the relative efficacy of a wide variety of interrogation approaches that are at the disposal of these investigators depending upon the situation (Kelly et al., 2013; Meisner et al., 2014; Vallano & Compo, 2015) less is known about the cognitively complex naturalistic decision-making process that must be performed…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once a young teen is admitted into a juvenile detention center, officers and detectives most likely interview the child. Interviewing a juvenile can have either be very successful or turn out to be a disaster. There are many pitfalls that come along with interviewing a juvenile. For example, once a young child is taken in for the interviewing process, they may feel extremely confused and scared. With this being the case, most individuals will not answer any of the attorney, officer, or even detectives questions.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, interrogators often apply this technique as the first step without any physical evidence, where they coerce their suspect to incriminate themselves…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Your name? Things like that. Even if somebody has invoked their right to remain silent, invoke their Miranda rights, the police are still allowed to ask questions like that because they are thought not to be designed to elicit an incriminating response.” This would just be general everyday information that we share with those around us so there is no serious danger for us to answer those general…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Juvenile Recidivism

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having interviewed other professionals that play a key role in juvenile criminal cases such as the Prosecutor or a Judge may have improved the scope of information gathered, and reduced limitations due to a limited subject size. Thus, the research was constrained on the similar views held by those working at the Fairfax County Public Defender’s office, and was regionally…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were then interviewed with a CI or standard interview (SI). Replicating earlier research, there was a significant increase in the number of correct details reported when witnesses were interviewed using CI with no cost to accuracy. Stein and Memon tested female cleaning staff in Brazil and found that the cognitive interview increased the amount of details remembered about a crime. The details remembered were often useful to the police including important details like a description of the criminal. This is further support for the effectiveness of the cognitive interview with a more representative sample of participants and suggests the cognitive interview is effective with ordinary people as well as students.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most officers are kind and passionate towards their work and protecting the community, trying their best to make quick second decisions that will create the best outcome for all involved. Police officers are hard working, dedicated people, and due to this dedication, it is difficult to find the time to interact with them. Thankfully, an inside look at the perspective of a law enforcement official was kindly given to me by a former officer who now teaches at Ceres High School, Randy Cerny. Cerny has been through many different positions in his law enforcement career of twelve plus years.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eyewitness Identification

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Officers from both samples had limited knowledge of eyewitness factors. Reports show that the protocol law enforcements used to conduct interviews and identification procedures violated many provisions of the National Institute of Justice’s Guide and Training Manual. Although one group made eyewitness reforms the difference in knowledge of eyewitness factors or in the use of proper…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This step is the stopping denials technique. This is when the suspect will deny their guilt increasing their confidence, so the interviewer will try to interrupt all denials. Sometimes the interviewer will tell the suspect it will be their turn to talk about the events later, but right now, they need to listen. From the start of the interrogation, the interviewer watches for denials and the proceeds to stop the suspect before they can voice them. The main reason for the stopping denial technique is to keep the suspect’s confidence low, and to stop their denials and quiet the suspect…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These details act as major testing ground for basing the proof of the suspect’s guilt. The interrogator is not very concerned with the relationship between them and the subjects. However, the PEACE MODEL necessitates engaging the witness or suspect and giving them a clue of what is expected of them and the need for compliance. This ensures that an understanding or a bond is established between the interviewer and the interviewee to make them feel comfortable giving you the information you need from…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    uring the interrogation, police use techniques that break down a suspect's resistance to admitting guilt. Police often lie about the existence of persuasive evidence against the suspect in order to persuade the suspect that there is no way out and confessing will improve the situation. Interrogators can communicate to the suspect that the suspect will receive a higher charge or harsher punishment if he does not confess (or lesser is he does confess). The interrogator may also wear down or distress the subject to the point where he believes he has no choice but to confess.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Various factors distinguish the term interview from interrogation. Such as, an interview is a conversation between two or more people where the interviewer asks questions to obtain facts or statements from the interviewee. An interview is also conducted in a friendly atmosphere making a witness more comfortable psychologically and physically (Gupta 155). Recruiters, journalist, media reporters and researchers use interview, so, therefore, a discussion can be structured or unstructured. However, the primary goal of an interrogation is to get the truth from a person especially suspect in an uncomfortable atmosphere, where he or she is under psychological stress and pressure (Gupta 158).…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays