Australia, for example, reversed the nation’s carbon tax following a change in political parties, thereby upending an earlier promise to price carbon until at least 2050. Likewise, several countries have reduced their gasoline taxes in response to rising energy costs, suggesting that carbon taxes might also be vulnerable to fluctuations in electricity prices. Case in point: British Columbia’s carbon tax became a lightning rod for political opponents following a sudden spike in gasoline prices. The surprise election of President Donald Trump further highlights the perils of relying on government pricing schemes. Firms that began preparing for the rollout of President Obama’s Clean Power Plan—a regulation that would have required the power sector to reduce carbon emissions by about 32 percent below 2005 levels—may now find themselves at a competitive disadvantage, as President Trump has promised to dismantle the
Australia, for example, reversed the nation’s carbon tax following a change in political parties, thereby upending an earlier promise to price carbon until at least 2050. Likewise, several countries have reduced their gasoline taxes in response to rising energy costs, suggesting that carbon taxes might also be vulnerable to fluctuations in electricity prices. Case in point: British Columbia’s carbon tax became a lightning rod for political opponents following a sudden spike in gasoline prices. The surprise election of President Donald Trump further highlights the perils of relying on government pricing schemes. Firms that began preparing for the rollout of President Obama’s Clean Power Plan—a regulation that would have required the power sector to reduce carbon emissions by about 32 percent below 2005 levels—may now find themselves at a competitive disadvantage, as President Trump has promised to dismantle the