His first foolish decision comes from the fact that he wishes to give away his kingdom. “Lear’s plan to divide his country and retire indicates that his judgement is flawed”4 as “to Shakespeare’s audience, such an announcement – dividing up the country – would have been horrifying, a vivisection of the body politic, a violation of cosmic order, denial of primogeniture, and a certain prelude to civil war.”5 For Lear to make such a decision clearly shows how foolish he is becoming by his desire to “[abdicate] his responsibility as king, choosing personal comfort over public duty.”6 Beyond this, Lear’s foolishness is also demonstrated in his decision to banish Kent and his most loving daughter. “Lear’s egocentricity blinds him to the truth of his one loyal daughter, Cordelia, and Kent, his one loyal knight, making them appear to him the very opposite of what they are.”7 Despite Kent going so far as to speak up “when majesty falls to folly,”8 he becomes but another casualty to the king’s
His first foolish decision comes from the fact that he wishes to give away his kingdom. “Lear’s plan to divide his country and retire indicates that his judgement is flawed”4 as “to Shakespeare’s audience, such an announcement – dividing up the country – would have been horrifying, a vivisection of the body politic, a violation of cosmic order, denial of primogeniture, and a certain prelude to civil war.”5 For Lear to make such a decision clearly shows how foolish he is becoming by his desire to “[abdicate] his responsibility as king, choosing personal comfort over public duty.”6 Beyond this, Lear’s foolishness is also demonstrated in his decision to banish Kent and his most loving daughter. “Lear’s egocentricity blinds him to the truth of his one loyal daughter, Cordelia, and Kent, his one loyal knight, making them appear to him the very opposite of what they are.”7 Despite Kent going so far as to speak up “when majesty falls to folly,”8 he becomes but another casualty to the king’s