Indian Removal Act Justified Essay

Improved Essays
Imagine your family made a beautiful quilt full of their history and lineage, one that has been passed down to each generation. Now imagine that someone offered to buy that quilt from you, promising a good amount of money and another, “better”, quilt. This is like the Cherokee’s situation. The president promised new and better land, but it wasn’t as good as it sounded. When the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed, it gave the president, Andrew Jackson, power to talk to the tribes and negotiate them into signing a treaty saying that they will move to the Indian Territory. He promised money and new land, and most tribes moved, but the Cherokee refused, and for good reasons. The Indian Removal act was not justified at all since the Cherokee helped us during the war of 1812, the Supreme Court already sided with the …show more content…
Some people believe that because the Indians already signed the treaty, they should still move, but as it was stated before, Americans have broken treaties plenty of times. In addition to that, it was only the chiefs that had actually signed the treaties, not the actual elected government; more than 90% of the Cherokee did not agree to move.

As a final point, many Americans, such as President Andrew Jackson, believe that the Indians were getting a good deal. Free land that’s bigger than Georgia, and 5 million dollars along with it. However, many Cherokee would not even make it to Indian Territory. 4,000 out of 15,000 Cherokee died on the way. Hunger, disease, and exhaustion played a big role in these deaths. Also, the Indians had their horses stolen, and were treated horribly, even in the new land.

In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act was not justified due to the amount of Indians that actually opposed the idea, the deaths caused by the move, and since the Supreme Court already ruled in favor for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the Indian Removal the Indians were pushed out of their territory and pushed to new territory. The policy made the Indians live longer making them rich and wealthy with new and extensive territory. The Indian Removal act did its purpose and didn’t end with annihilation from war. The United States benefited the Indians, “The United States will play to send the natives to a land where they may live longer and possibly survive as a people”(Doc A). The act was a benefit to both sides.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce with forging nations, and several States, and Indians tribes. In the negotiation between the Indians and the government, the Indians acknowledge themselves sovereign nation.as under the protection of the United States government and no other Jackson recommended Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. That act gave the President the authority to give up land in west Mississippi River to Indians that would give up their land to the government. The Law allowed the Indians material and financial assistance to get to their new location. Jackson's government succeeded in general terms.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sacred land was illegally and unconstitutionally being taken from the Cherokee. Lastly, the government had basically tricked the Indians into giving away their land, and made promises they didn’t keep. The first reason why the Indian Removal Act was not justified was because innocent Indians were forced to go on this treacherous journey while not getting enough food, water, and shelter. They started migrating towards present day Oklahoma during the winter of 1838.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert V Remini Summary

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Remini says Jackson felt that the only solution for both the Unites States and the Native tribes was that they had to be removed. This attitude towards the Indians followed him into the White house when he was elected President in 1828. Of all the things Jackson accomplished during his presidency, his Indian Removal Act was most important. Jackson finally accomplished his long thought solution to the Indian problem. Today’s historians see this a cruel act against his seemingly long term enemy.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most everyone has heard or learned about the Indian removal act and probably wondered how that was made and why it wasn 't vetoed or ruled unconstitutional. The Indian removal act was a law that was passed that allowed the president to make treaties with the native americans and try to offer them money and land somewhere else for there land. Andrew jackson got a lot of the tribes to sign the treaties but the ones that did not were pushed out by force anyway. This led to the Trail of tears which was when Andrew Jackson pushed out all of the Cherokee Nation with force and caused over 4000 native americans to lose their lives. The checks and balances system did not work as planned during this time the government was controlled by one party and…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the cherokees should've moved because they had done horrible things to people, better land, and freedom. The first reason, the cherokees should’ve moved is because they have done horrible…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things that lead up to the Indian removal act being passed was the greed of white settlers who kept moving onto Indian lands. They believed the Indians were in their way and pressured the federal government for Indian land. All five tribes showed resistance, but the Cherokee tried doing it the peaceful way. Their leader John Ross took their case to the Supreme Court. Chief John Marshall appealed to the Cherokee in March of 1832 and said “The law of the Georgians can have no force”.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays