Essay On 7th Amendment

Improved Essays
The rights granted by Constitution have a substantial impact on the lives of American citizens. Many of these rights such as the freedom of speech, to bear arms, and to decline to answering questions are very well known by the citizens and are used often everyday. However other rights granted by the Constitution are not as well understood yet still play a fundamental role in the liberties bestowed to Americans. Case in point, consider the 7th Amendment which issues the right to trial by jury and that no fact tried by a jury shall be re–examined. These rights granted by the 7th Amendment have a dramatic role within the predominate common law system of America and as such gives citizens privileges that are vital. Ultimately while not as well known as certain other amendments, the 7th Amendment plays a vital role within the lives of Americans.

The first aspect of the 7th Amendment is perhaps its most well known which is the right to trial by jury. The 7th
…show more content…
The issue is that without this clause, courts would have the power to disregard civil juries by retrying facts on appeal. To prevent these worries, a need for protection of the views of juries was needed. By making it where appellate courts could review judgments only on questions of law, the integrity of jury decisions would remain.

Furthermore this clause much like the clause to the right of trial by jury also appreciably affects the lives of citizens. Thanks to this, appeals courts are required to respect the findings of juries and may not freely use appeals power to over rule decisions. Rather when permitted by law, the judges only have the power within limits of the Constitution. For the accused this means that they do not have to worry about tyrannical persons using appeals to subvert justice, rather it means that they are ensured that the decisions of the jury will be treated as leaders like Hamilton

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparing the United States Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists, it will be shown that all three of these historical documents relate to one another in some form, especially the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. It is important to note the dates that each document was written, as this has bearing on the relationship between each document. The Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson, edited by the Second Continental Congress, and adopted by them on July, 4 1776. It was a written statement severing political independence of the thirteen original American colonies from Great Britain, therefore declaring themselves and independent nation.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This made colonists highly upset, which would be one of the leading causes of the American Revolution. When the original members of the constitutional convention wrote the Bill of Rights, they understood how important it was to have a fair court system, so they made sure that the right to have a trial by jury was an official law of the United States. The 7th Amendment states: 'In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States,…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This case questioned the Sixth Amendment 's extension of the right to counsel in state criminal felony cases. In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the right to counsel and argued that it extended to all cases. Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark argued that the Constitution guarantees the right to counsel in order to protect due process. The Gideon v Wainwright case was as milestone decision in which the Constitution was interpreted very…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bill of Rights to every American is the crown jewel center piece of our constitution and from which just about all legal proceedings are based from. Akhil Reed Amar's "The Bill of Rights as a constitution" pages 1131-1210 and 1193-1284, details and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the Bill of Rights. Amendments such as the fifth, ninth, and tenth are currently the sole topic of college courses such as Constitutional Law, the sixth, eighth, and a majority of the fifth are taught in Criminal Procedure and the seventh is taught in Criminal Procedure. Teaching these amendments to Americans is essential so that when issues arise we can have the knowledge we've learned right on hand. In the current day and age interpretations of the…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On 14th Amendment

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If you were going to become president of the United States would you keep the 14th Amendment like it is or would you alter it slightly? In the race for president between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump is proposing to modify the 14th Amendment to end its guarantee of “birthright citizenship.” This means that someone born on American soil to parents who are not citizens would no longer automatically be a citizen. The issue of birthright citizenship is debatable and it is a topic of importance in this year's election. It makes sense that if a person’s parents were not born in the United States that their kid would be an American citizen if they were born here.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution consists of 27 amendments. Each amendment was written for a specific purpose. The three amendments that I believe are very important to the United States Constitution include the 8th amendment, the 4th amendment and the 13th amendment. These three amendments help to protect the rights of American citizens and make sure that all rights are equal. The 8th amendment prohibits excessive fines and bail, and prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted “ (US). This is what the Eighth Amendment states. Although excessive bail and fines are intriguing, what’s more striking about the Eighth Amendment is that it mentions “cruel and unusual punishments”. Although you would think “cruel and unusual punishments” might be rare I think you’d be surprised how many cases deal strictly with what the Eighth Amendment prohibits.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chase’s why the First Amendment is important to protect First let me elaborate on what the First Amendment entails. The First Amendment guarantees us the freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Having the First Amendment as it is today introduces people to lots of things that the government would probably have banned or prevented us from seeing if we didn 't have the First Amendment. the government could make it to where anyone who doesn 't agree with them cant voice their opinions which would prevent us from experiencing the things we can and do today. When the First Amendment is upheld by SCOTUS ( Supreme Court of The United State) it further fortifies it making are freedoms more secure.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rights of the State under Constitution. Out of those ten amendments, I believe the most important one that most American would pay attention to is 1, 2 and 4. The reason why I think this is every American want to be able to express their opinion/religion, most American feels that they need to have weapons in their home to protect their family and American do not like to be stop and search for no apparent…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics