In project evaluation
I have evaluated the entire project that we have done such as finding the results and solution, what can be improved if we face the similar problem in future, what are the key aspects to identify the problem and what all process we have used to complete case study as well as what targets we have set which will help to nail down solution, therefore individual critical review will help us to understand the each roles played by team members and how the team meetings were conducted which results in completion of project also what input we got from the team which will give good output.
Background
As a group we have done project on Banana NZ it is a Korean manufacturing company which produces computer accessories for business …show more content…
Sometimes we decided to meet at some team member’s place for discussion and to give feedback on our assigned work.
In my group the communication was the problem whenever the team meetings was scheduled there was not any appropriate timing ,all the members were informed on the short notice. But by considering the availability if we are late they threaten us by giving less mark in peer evaluation.
Leadership/collabaration
This was the key problem in our group as there was no leader each individual has to play their own part. Every team needs a leader to encourage and motivate them but in our group it was lacking not any of them work was appreciated.
Nichola was much of arrogant at the time of project there was no any quality of leadership within her because of that I have given her less marks.
Manpreet gave us the idea of project with patiently and listen to our point of views so I have given him the highest marks in negotiation and conflicts among …show more content…
But instead she told me that “please don’t ask me I don’t know anything about it you do whatever you want to” then also I went and whatever I found at that time I gave but they were like you were not present in group discussion, you are very irresponsible and information you gave is not relevant.
On our second meeting at parmeets place I was late and I had explain reason behind it but nichola started using inappropriate words and saying if I don’t arrive from mt roskill to civic center in 5 minutes otherwise she would left and our meeting will postpone.
At parmeets place as parmeet was not interested in discussion she sat outside and other team members were discussing and giving suggestion to one another without sharing with me and when I ask they were like not interested in listening
In peer evaluation they gave me least mark in attendance and contribution because I didn’t know when our other meetings conducted and they were not interested in telling individually.
THEORIES
There are two main motivational
I have evaluated the entire project that we have done such as finding the results and solution, what can be improved if we face the similar problem in future, what are the key aspects to identify the problem and what all process we have used to complete case study as well as what targets we have set which will help to nail down solution, therefore individual critical review will help us to understand the each roles played by team members and how the team meetings were conducted which results in completion of project also what input we got from the team which will give good output.
Background
As a group we have done project on Banana NZ it is a Korean manufacturing company which produces computer accessories for business …show more content…
Sometimes we decided to meet at some team member’s place for discussion and to give feedback on our assigned work.
In my group the communication was the problem whenever the team meetings was scheduled there was not any appropriate timing ,all the members were informed on the short notice. But by considering the availability if we are late they threaten us by giving less mark in peer evaluation.
Leadership/collabaration
This was the key problem in our group as there was no leader each individual has to play their own part. Every team needs a leader to encourage and motivate them but in our group it was lacking not any of them work was appreciated.
Nichola was much of arrogant at the time of project there was no any quality of leadership within her because of that I have given her less marks.
Manpreet gave us the idea of project with patiently and listen to our point of views so I have given him the highest marks in negotiation and conflicts among …show more content…
But instead she told me that “please don’t ask me I don’t know anything about it you do whatever you want to” then also I went and whatever I found at that time I gave but they were like you were not present in group discussion, you are very irresponsible and information you gave is not relevant.
On our second meeting at parmeets place I was late and I had explain reason behind it but nichola started using inappropriate words and saying if I don’t arrive from mt roskill to civic center in 5 minutes otherwise she would left and our meeting will postpone.
At parmeets place as parmeet was not interested in discussion she sat outside and other team members were discussing and giving suggestion to one another without sharing with me and when I ask they were like not interested in listening
In peer evaluation they gave me least mark in attendance and contribution because I didn’t know when our other meetings conducted and they were not interested in telling individually.
THEORIES
There are two main motivational