Today it has several varieties of laboratories, it has helped advance our technology today. Therefore security conditions are not normal to any other laboratory, these are much stricter and security, is a priority for the types of chemicals used in these laboratories, and can not only endanger the lives of the people who work there, but also many others who may be affected by a single mistake. That is why the rules, standards, and precautions are important base of the safety of all to prevent pollution problems and why not even a greater misfortune. Based on well-known facts as were the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1954) which caused irreparable damage, and knowing the results of those catastrophic events that do not require further demonstration (axiom) is the why it was necessary to look for new rules for science to allow social difference from other subjects of less risk, thus allowing its existence, and continue their study in this dangerous field. With these examples, nuclear science began to form with rules, and values that are considered mandatory for the scientists, these are also moral and private principles cannot be violated for the progress of science and knowledge. In all industrial plants laboratory tasks are performed; the size, type and importance of these tasks will naturally vary according to the needs of each particular industry, regardless of its size in all laboratories virtually there are dangers of accidents, some of whose consequences can be very serious, and that consequently should be avoided.
…show more content…
The risk of nuclear power plants is due to the presence and possible escape of radiation and radioactive products produced in the reactor core. Therefore, nuclear safety is based on designing, building and operating nuclear laboratories for production safely, people and scientists working there, without involving a risk to the population and lab workers. It is true that they are more and more people around the world believe, that nuclear weapons are not considered for their power, but for their ability to generate misfortunes, and others who see them as completely negative. Is that one of the reasons that these laboratories are maintained with maximum security and away from the "civilization" The organization of laboratory safety includes the definition of the responsibilities for safety, as well as protocols and information that must be enforced in laboratories to prevent accidents. Safety issues must be addressed with the head or chief of the laboratory, which will have the obligation to explain to all staff to follow the rules and all the staff working in the laboratories must abide by the rules. However, when talking about nuclear weapons, the effects would be absolutely devastating, since the damage caused by radiation over large areas would cause ozone depletion by nitrogen oxides from nuclear explosions, and climate change caused by smoke large and prolonged fires seriously affect most of the planet. And there are still those who doubt these facts. There are physical prof, and the results from exposure to radiation which is harmful to health and becomes mortal. Radiation sickness is considered all those conditions resulting from exposure to radioactive emissions. People cannot see or detect radiation, but radioactive contaminants accumulate in the body and, eventually, their action can lead to diseases like cancer. When Gusterson tells us that scientists are not afraid to nuclear weapons, is probably the justification of unilateral preventive defense, where the issue of whether a state may invoke the right to act in self-defense in advance not only to avoid arises an imminent, or proximate threat but also to prevent a threat that is neither imminent nor next. In the Livermore laboratory in the 80 's weapons were a way to stabilize the effect of the cold war. Respondents argue affirmatively that the damage that can result from some terrorist threats with a nuclear weapon is so great that simply cannot risk waiting until the threat is imminent and that the damage can be reduced (avoid a nuclear exchange or fallout due to the destruction of a reactor) if acted before. The debate on whether preventive defense is a valid approach to current needs for security and
The risk of nuclear power plants is due to the presence and possible escape of radiation and radioactive products produced in the reactor core. Therefore, nuclear safety is based on designing, building and operating nuclear laboratories for production safely, people and scientists working there, without involving a risk to the population and lab workers. It is true that they are more and more people around the world believe, that nuclear weapons are not considered for their power, but for their ability to generate misfortunes, and others who see them as completely negative. Is that one of the reasons that these laboratories are maintained with maximum security and away from the "civilization" The organization of laboratory safety includes the definition of the responsibilities for safety, as well as protocols and information that must be enforced in laboratories to prevent accidents. Safety issues must be addressed with the head or chief of the laboratory, which will have the obligation to explain to all staff to follow the rules and all the staff working in the laboratories must abide by the rules. However, when talking about nuclear weapons, the effects would be absolutely devastating, since the damage caused by radiation over large areas would cause ozone depletion by nitrogen oxides from nuclear explosions, and climate change caused by smoke large and prolonged fires seriously affect most of the planet. And there are still those who doubt these facts. There are physical prof, and the results from exposure to radiation which is harmful to health and becomes mortal. Radiation sickness is considered all those conditions resulting from exposure to radioactive emissions. People cannot see or detect radiation, but radioactive contaminants accumulate in the body and, eventually, their action can lead to diseases like cancer. When Gusterson tells us that scientists are not afraid to nuclear weapons, is probably the justification of unilateral preventive defense, where the issue of whether a state may invoke the right to act in self-defense in advance not only to avoid arises an imminent, or proximate threat but also to prevent a threat that is neither imminent nor next. In the Livermore laboratory in the 80 's weapons were a way to stabilize the effect of the cold war. Respondents argue affirmatively that the damage that can result from some terrorist threats with a nuclear weapon is so great that simply cannot risk waiting until the threat is imminent and that the damage can be reduced (avoid a nuclear exchange or fallout due to the destruction of a reactor) if acted before. The debate on whether preventive defense is a valid approach to current needs for security and