Nystrand (1983, p. 60) suggests that written and spoken communication vary most with relevance the contexts within which each is formed and need function. Writers, not like speakers, do not propose language within the language receiver. And written texts, not like spoken, should perform apart the context of their production. The writer’s scenario is extraneous to actual text functioning. For example, where the author composes, what may well be viewed from the writer’s window throughout the composing method, what music may need provided inspiration, all these aspects of the composer’s scenario whereas writing are not functionally important (Nystrand 1983, p. 55-65). In business communication, context brings about the factoring in risks and specific info that may have an influence on communication …show more content…
That is why, people should always think about context as a product of a range of informational aspects that creates the scene for the interaction. According to Kramsch (2001, p. 46), he pointed out "Context is the matrix created by language as discourse and as a form of social practice". So, this social product of linguistic and communication decisions " these choices in turn hold together, control, manipulate, and maintain the social order, that is, the social organization of classrooms, homes , and workplaces" (Kramsch 2001, p.