Analysis: A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson

Improved Essays
Judith Jarvis Thomson describes a fetus as being as much of a moral person as anyone, but he or she is not in fact entitled to using the mother’s precious resources. The idea of bodily autonomy is heavily stressed in her paper, “A Defense of Abortion”. Most of those who are against abortion tend to use the point that a fetus is a person as their major leg to stand on. Thomson argues that they fail to discuss what is impermissible about abortion. She provides strong reasoning for why abortion should be allowed and still makes the distinction that some cases should not permit it. “While I do argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that it is always permissible.(345).” Again and again the notion that there exists a right to life for all people is continually brought up throughout her rationale. Thoman’s arguments are centered around the example of a violinist. She tells us to imagine we were to be connected to a world famous violinist suffering from kidney failure via a machine that is keeping this musician alive. Your health is not affected, but it is required that you stay attached to the violinist for a …show more content…
This case would be where the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother. Those who do not even condone abortion in this case feel that aborting the baby would be murdering an innocent child. This brings up the interesting point of the alternative of just letting the mother die, which is seen as better. Thomson, however, thinks that a woman has a right to protect her body from a threat, even if this means killing her unborn child. She goes on to use a house analogy, where the mother's body is a house, rented to mother and child but owned solely by the mother. “A woman surely can defend her life against the threat to it posed by the unborn child, even if doing so involves its death(339).” In other words she can evict the child if she pleases to do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The newly fertilized ovum is no more a person than an acorn is an oak tree. Suppose we assume, just for the sake of argument, that the fetus is a person with the right to life from the moment of conception. It does not follow; she argues that abortion is never justified. She appeals to a series of imaginary cases, such as being kidnapped and plugged into a famous violinist, being trapped in a tiny house with a growing child, and having people seeds growing in your carpet. Reflection on these cases shows that the right to life is only the right not to be killed unjustly; it does not entail the right to use your body or to live in your house.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson presents the anti-abortionist argument in the beginning of her paper. In order to get a better understanding of the argument I have taken the time to put it in numbered premise conclusion form: Every person has a right to life. The fetus is a person.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though the child is not able to make decisions, contractualism is against abortion. Being in the child 's position, it is not morally permissible because the child has done nothing wrong for it to be killed. However, the mother may feel as if she had made the correct decisions at the wrong time. Therefore she is giving herself more time. Time that would be needed to think if the mother is willing to have a child and be able to support…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every unborn child should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the second and third trimester. In 2010, research shows that states indicated that unborn children are considered humans under tort, property and criminal law (Roden, 2010). By these laws shown, a mother shouldn’t get to choose whether the fetus lives or dies. The unborn child is its own person and by a mother aborting her own child should be considered murder. Under law a child is supposed to be born for many different reasons, including being capable of having a legacy (Roden, 2010).…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She presents the view that the right of the mother to her bodily integrity carries greater value than the right to life of the fetus. She presents very convincing cases in instances where the pregnancy is due to violence – through rape or abuse, and a somewhat weaker argument that applies to unwanted pregnancies that occur even though reasonable precautions had been…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Permissibility of Abortion: Noonan V. Thompson The topic of abortion has been of much dispute throughout time. Some seeing abortion as the mother’s right to choice, others as murder. Most pro-life supporters argue that fetuses have the right to life and to aborting it is murder. Judith Thompson concedes that fetuses may have the right to life but that only gives the fetus a right to not be unjustly killed.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abortion is the act of purposely killing a human fetus. This action is legal in the United States of America due to the differing opinions regarding it. In this essay, I will discuss whether, or not abortion is morally permissible. If Abortion is in fact morally permissible, is it permissible in all or just some situations? I will argue that abortion is only morally correct in cases of a fetus having a severe genetic disorder and when the mother’s life is in danger.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays