This case would be where the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother. Those who do not even condone abortion in this case feel that aborting the baby would be murdering an innocent child. This brings up the interesting point of the alternative of just letting the mother die, which is seen as better. Thomson, however, thinks that a woman has a right to protect her body from a threat, even if this means killing her unborn child. She goes on to use a house analogy, where the mother's body is a house, rented to mother and child but owned solely by the mother. “A woman surely can defend her life against the threat to it posed by the unborn child, even if doing so involves its death(339).” In other words she can evict the child if she pleases to do
This case would be where the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother. Those who do not even condone abortion in this case feel that aborting the baby would be murdering an innocent child. This brings up the interesting point of the alternative of just letting the mother die, which is seen as better. Thomson, however, thinks that a woman has a right to protect her body from a threat, even if this means killing her unborn child. She goes on to use a house analogy, where the mother's body is a house, rented to mother and child but owned solely by the mother. “A woman surely can defend her life against the threat to it posed by the unborn child, even if doing so involves its death(339).” In other words she can evict the child if she pleases to do