Immanuel Kant Research Paper

Improved Essays
There are countless people you could analyze for philosophers on metaphysics. Immanuel Kant is seen as the central figure for modern philosophy. He changed early modern rationalism and empiricism and set term for most of 19th and 20th century philosophy. He continues to have a great significance in today’s metaphysics. He also has an influence in epistemology, ethics, political, and many other fields. Kant has many theories but his main theory was “critical philosophy”, seen in his three Critiques. The Critique of Pure Reason, the Critique of Practical Reason, and the Critique of the Power of Judgment, are all human autonomy. Kant argues that the human understanding is the source of the general laws of nature. Kant goes on to that the structure …show more content…
Immanuel was the 4th of 9 children. HE was born in 1724 in Konigsberg, East Prussia. Kant matured under the influence of Pietism which is a Protestant sect. The sect is very popular in north Germany in the 18th century. Kant, at the age of 8, went to Collegium Fridiricianum. Collegium Fridiricianum is a Latin School that specially taught classicism. Kant studied here for 8 years and of those years learned much, and after he attended the University of Konigsberg. His academic career was spent on philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Kant work as a private tutor for close to a decade for very influential family to support his younger …show more content…
The Critique is the possibility of metaphysics, understood in a specific way. “The definition of metaphysic is the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time, and space.” (Dictionary.com) Kant defines in his own terms, he says,” the cognitions after which reason might strive independently of all experience.” (Rohlf) The critique’s goal is to come to a conclusion about the impossibility or possibility of metaphysics in general and the determination of its many sources, its extent, and its boundaries. Metaphysic in Kant’s eyes is a knowledge of priori or knowledge of justification that does not depend on experience. The project, which is the Critique, is to examine how and to what extent human reason is capable of priori

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    art IIII: Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant published A Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) five years after Bentham’s Principles of Morals and Legislations, launching a scathing critique of utilitarianism. Kant proposed that a moral action does not suggest treating individuals as a means to an end. What Kant means by this is that we treat individuals for the sake of something else (means), such as Dudley and Stephens treating Parker as a means to maximise happiness. Instead, a moral action is one that treats individuals as ends in themselves, one that does not account for external influences such as happiness. Individuals are worthy of dignity and respect not because we own our bodies and minds but because we are rational beings, capable of reason and conscious thought.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the essay, he emphasizes on the need for people to use their own powers of understanding and reasoning instead of depending on others or on an external system to provide it to them. This essay is essentially a plea for the vital importance of freedom of speech, thought, and debate. When people use other people to make his decisions, their life becomes much easier. But in this process, Kant argues that it disables them from taking their own decisions with their own intellect and hence people gets ultimately immature. This immaturity becomes second nature to him.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant basically says that man is immature and relies on others do the thinking for him, he says “If I have a book which provides meaning for me, a pastor who has conscience…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this time, he thoroughly acquainted himself with the works of German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, whom Schleiermacher…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly, Kant presents A priori ideas, which in term is a special kind of idea that tells you about the possibility of human experience, however these experiences don’t depend on experience that you have already had, but are supplied by reason in order to make sense of an…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explains how to tell if something is done from duty or from a self-seeking purpose. Actions can be seen as good when they are done for duty only not inclination. The second proposition, he brings up how actions are not to just be attained, but in the maxim that is the reason for the action. The third proposition which Kant mentions is a consequence of the other two. This…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality and happiness are closely intertwined in the ethical theories of a handful of philosophers. Such can be seen in the philosophies of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and Friedrich Nietzsche. These three philosophers address the relationship held between the “good” and “happy.” Kant begins his analysis of the relationship between “good” and “happy” by discussing the Good Will. It is through this constitution that a man can be seen as worthy of happiness.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ] Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Kant, I. and Gregor, M.J., 1999. Practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press. [Originally published in 1785.]…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manoriña, Gladys U. BSAcT4 MW 3:00-4:30 PM REFLECTION PAPER Metaethics deals primarily with the question: What is the source of ethical concepts and what do ethical concepts mean? There are two issues prominent in metaethics: 1. Metaphysics, which concerns with the question on whether morality exists independently of man, and 2. the question on the psychological basis for man’s moral judgment and conduct.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays