The Government took food that the peasants had grown this removed any incentive they had to produce, naturally famine followed, which led to the death of around five million people, which shows…
Sophia Nguyen Period 5 Chapter 1 Document 1. I feel that Nisa’s account of her life helps with understanding the much earlier Paleolithic people is very helpful because it gives a first person perspective on the life of a person living in a hunting-gathering society, like the Paleolithic people. Because Nisa doesn’t get much exposure to people outside her society, communicating with others was especially more important to her. 2. To Nisa, sex was very important to her because she didn’t want to make love until she had fully realized the idea of love.…
People had to start bartering instead of exchanging money, causing limited money flow. Farming decreased a great deal, resulting in famine and financial difficulties for merchants and farmers. There were many people who migrated to the…
Some of them starved to death or became violently ill. Physically it took a toll on all people, but the youngest suffered most. People who lived on farms did not have running water, they got it from a well. When the drought happened, people could not get fresh water to drink or bathe with. This also contributed to the physical decline of children.…
If, however, the population of the whole country grew and the population of town population grew as well, the case would have to be that less people produced more food, ergo agricultural productivity rose. This logical outcome, however, is not the only indicator of agricultural productivity. In fact, this rise was even greater, given that the percentage of labor force engaged in agriculture decreased dramatically from 76% in 1520 to 33% by 1750. This led to more services offered in villages and, therefore, development of rural areas. Since an average farmer could now feed more people, villagers were more confident to go to the cities and seek employment there, knowing that food would be available.…
The higher social classes heavily relied on the peasant population as their workforce. Because so many of the peasants died, there were less workers on the fields, therefore they became more independent. The peasantry started to demand better treatment and higher pay. Landowners had to offer free food, clothing, and good pay to get and keep employees. Peasants had to find new ways of getting money, and the lack of control the nobles had over them meant increased social mobility.…
This week's reading and lecture opens my eyes of course to how America was founded, and the different people groups that were among the first to settle in America. My interest was taken in the first people group known as the hunter-gatherers. The lives of the hunter-gatherers had to be wearing on their bodies and minds as they had to migrate along with the animals they hunted for food. Anything possessions had to be small, and living quarters were primitive, consisting of crude tents and huts, and no kind of village could be established due to following food around. " Always on the go" seems to be their way of life at this time in history.…
The rural populations were not dependent on the urban markets as a source of their food. As a result, they had far less to fear scarcity of food in their homes. They also had easier access to grain in times…
As explained in his infamous essay, “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race,” Jared Diamond argues that the adoption of agriculture led to many negative consequences that have hindered the general livelihood of humans. His argument is based on the comparison of the lifestyles of agriculture-based societies and hunter-gatherers, claiming that the latter lacked many of the challenging aspects that emerged with the beginnings of domestication and civilization. Diamond’s main points of focus are the negative health effects of people’s new diet, the increased spread of diseases, and the development of societal inequalities. In general, I agree with Diamond’s claim that the adoption of agriculture had some negative effects on humans,…
This led to a more innovative and an advanced society. The people learned different uses of the animals such as for the military, which led to the making of weapons. D. Chapter 6: What factors contributed to hunter-gatherers becoming farmers? Hunter-gatherers had traded with other farmers who had given them the idea of food production. Also, there was a “decline in the availability of wild foods” (Diamond, 110), and the resources they depended on decreased.…
A long time ago Hunter-Gatherers was the main way of getting food and resources needed to survive. Hunter-Gatherer is defined as “a member of a nomadic people who live chiefly by hunting, fishing, and harvesting wild food”. Back then they had no social hierarchy, no powers, and no special building used for religious beliefs. In today’s society we have evolved into farmers which agriculture and farming came in slowly. Farming is defined as “the activity or business of growing crops and raising livestock”.…
Paleolithic hunter-gatherer societies used technological weapons such as bow and arrow to kill animals such as spears that were made from animal bone, stone, and wood. They also used fire to protect them from animals as well as using it to cook their food. They used wood to make rafts to they would be able to catch fish to eat which provided a mean of preventing starvation when seasons changed and land animals would migrate.…
A settled lifestyle was more superior to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle in early societies because they had a lot of food,women were able to have many kids, and they were able to have many different things due to having a settled life. “The birth interval for higher birth of food producers is around two years, half that of hunter- gatherers. That higher birth rate of food producers, together with their ability to feed more people per acre” (89). This quote shows that having a settled lifestyle is better than being a hunter-gatherer because you are able to produce a lot of plants like potatoes and carrots and have animals reproducing can also get you different things like milk and meat. This also means that the population can grow at a higher…
Farming and the granary were important innovations that led to the development of early civilizations. When plants and animals were scarce due to year-long drought, people were no longer able to live a nomadic lifestyle. This is why farming proved to be so crucial. One example is the farming of wheat and barley. These crops were able to survive the dry climate and last for years.…
They were always moving from place, following the food wherever the were at, and wherever they were going to. One thing that they have that is good is a diverse diet. It keeps them healthy and the food I feel like would never get boring and disgusting. I think if you were an agriculturalist the food that you would be eating would be the same, constantly just eating the same food over and over again. An agriculturalist would have to wait on his or her food for an amount of time also.…