They hypothesized that the difference in bill curvature between the sexes would be greater for the species with the longest bills and questioned if this dimorphism is formed through sexual selection or natural selection (Temeles, Miller, and Rifkin). This research is crucial because it could explain the diversity in hummingbird species and seeks to understand the forces that have and continue to shape the formation of dimorphism. For the study, the researchers examined 856 adult hummingbird specimens from a museum collection to measure bill morphology and wing length. There were approximately 16 males and 13 females observed for each of the 30 species of hummingbirds collected. Each hummingbird was measured for the length in millimeters of the exposed culmen (top part of bill), total bill (bill tip to gape or end of bill), arc length of exposed culmen, and wing cord (wing length when held at 90 degree angle). Equation R=(C/2)/sinA was used to mathematically compare bill curvature, R = radius, C = length of culmen, A = angle of declension measured using a circular protractor. To quantify sexual dimorphism, the researchers used Lovich – Gibbons two-step ratio using species averages, s.d. = (L/S-1) x (+/-1), with L = average size of the larger sex and S = average size of the smaller sex (Temeles, Miller, and Rifkin). Through the numbers calculated, the researchers then constructed three figures to organize and display their collected data. Figure 1 shows that there is many species that display sexual dimorphism in bill curvature with a female bias, bill length with a male bias, wing length with a strong male bias, and a bill arc length with a male bias. Figure 2 displays the numerical value of sexual dimorphism of bill curvature in each species in respect to their evolutionary tree to compare closely related hummingbird species. It shows that most of the hermit species, about 60%, have a large difference between
They hypothesized that the difference in bill curvature between the sexes would be greater for the species with the longest bills and questioned if this dimorphism is formed through sexual selection or natural selection (Temeles, Miller, and Rifkin). This research is crucial because it could explain the diversity in hummingbird species and seeks to understand the forces that have and continue to shape the formation of dimorphism. For the study, the researchers examined 856 adult hummingbird specimens from a museum collection to measure bill morphology and wing length. There were approximately 16 males and 13 females observed for each of the 30 species of hummingbirds collected. Each hummingbird was measured for the length in millimeters of the exposed culmen (top part of bill), total bill (bill tip to gape or end of bill), arc length of exposed culmen, and wing cord (wing length when held at 90 degree angle). Equation R=(C/2)/sinA was used to mathematically compare bill curvature, R = radius, C = length of culmen, A = angle of declension measured using a circular protractor. To quantify sexual dimorphism, the researchers used Lovich – Gibbons two-step ratio using species averages, s.d. = (L/S-1) x (+/-1), with L = average size of the larger sex and S = average size of the smaller sex (Temeles, Miller, and Rifkin). Through the numbers calculated, the researchers then constructed three figures to organize and display their collected data. Figure 1 shows that there is many species that display sexual dimorphism in bill curvature with a female bias, bill length with a male bias, wing length with a strong male bias, and a bill arc length with a male bias. Figure 2 displays the numerical value of sexual dimorphism of bill curvature in each species in respect to their evolutionary tree to compare closely related hummingbird species. It shows that most of the hermit species, about 60%, have a large difference between