❑ Presentation is easy to follow
❑ Moves succinctly from point-to-point
❑ Meets 2-4 minute time requirement
❑ Manuscript is typewritten Use of Emotional and Situational Appeals (2) – Speech of Presentation ❑ Appeals intensely to emotions of listeners
❑ Creates a feeling of anticipation and/or honor
❑ Adapts presentation to specific situation and audience Content (5) – Speech of Presentation ❑ Multiple types of support forms used in presentation (examples, stories, testimony)
❑ Multiple language techniques are used effectively and naturally
▪ Vivid language
▪ Alliteration
▪ Repetition
▪ Antithesis
▪ Metaphor
▪ Simile Organization/Content (3) – Speech of Acceptance ❑ Presentation is easy to follow
❑ Moves succinctly from point-to-point ❑ Meets 30 second-1 minute time requirement ❑ Content is meaningful Verbal Effectiveness (5) – Both Presentations ❑ Passion and intensity evident ❑ Incorporates vocal variety (i.e. varies rate, pitch, volume) ❑ Extremely familiar with manuscript ❑ Confidence projected Nonverbal Effectiveness (5) – Both Presentations ❑ Maintains appropriate eye contact with audience ❑ Uses gestures and facial expressions to connect with audience ❑ Movement motivated and not distracting ❑ Dress appropriate for speaking situation Presentation Skills-COM 150 (Finn): Page 18 Peer Critique Assignment Sheet & Evaluation Form Goal: Demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts by identifying strengths and areas for improvement of a classmate’s presentation. Assignment: View a “live” presentation of a fellow public speaking student and answer the following questions. Please use specific examples and refer to specific course concepts (class lectures and textbook material) to support your opinions. 1. Was the presentation audience-centered? Why or why not? What could the speaker do to make the presentation more audience-centered? (reference class notes & textbook) 2. Was the presentation well organized? Why or why not? (reference class notes & textbook) 3. Was the speaker successful in his/her delivery? Why or why not? (reference class notes & textbook) 4. What is one element of the presentation that went well? Why was it so successful? 5. What is one suggestion for improvement for future presentations? Format: The paper should be a minimum of 2 pages, double-spaced. Please include the name of the speaker and the topic of the presentation. Submission Guidelines: Any critiques submitted past the due date will receive a one point per day deduction; no critiques will be accepted after five days past the due date. Papers will not be accepted via email without agreement from the professor; hard copies must …show more content…
Presentation Skills-COM 150 (Finn): Page 19 Self Critique Assignment Sheet & Evaluation Form Goal: Demonstrate your understanding of the “10 Steps of the Presentation Preparation Process” and your ability to analyze yourself as a presenter. Assignment: View your informative or persuasive (not your informative process) presentation and evaluate your work for each of the 10 Steps covered in class. Please use specific examples and refer to lecture/textbook ideas to support your opinions. Format: The paper should be a minimum of 4 pages, double-spaced and adhere to the following format: Step #1: Set Goals of Presentation
Describe Step: Provide a brief description of this step.
Your presentation: Evaluation of your presentation relative to this step
Future Presentations: What will you do differently, if anything, for this step the next time you give a presentation? Step #2: Analyze the Audience
Describe Step: Provide a brief description of this step.
Your presentation: Evaluation of your presentation relative to this