How Did Rene Descartes Defeat Skepticism

Improved Essays
Descartes was a French philosopher who is considered today as the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. Descartes often fought with the idea of this thing called Skepticism, which is the philosophical position that knowledge is impossible. This did not sit well with Descartes so he decided to write a book called “The Meditations on First Philosophy” as a guide book to the truth. Descartes’ two main aims with this book were first, to address and defeat skepticism, and second, to attain perfect knowledge, which is knowledge that is absolutely certain and indubitable; he aimed to used this idea of perfect knowledge to defeat skepticism. One of the first things Descartes had to do in order to defeat skepticism was look at his own beliefs and doubt all …show more content…
This certainty is undoubtable because of a few things. If one was to doubt that they existed, that would be self defeating. In order for one to doubt, one must exist. One popular counter argument to this certainty is what if some omnipotent being, such as God, is deceiving one about one’s existence? Well the answer to that is fairly simple, if God is deceiving him, then he must exist in order to be deceived. God can deceive one about anything else, but he will never be able to deceive one about their existence. Another popular argument is since one can say “I think therefore I am”, can one then say “I walk therefore I am” as a way to prove their existence? The answer to that is no. This is because people can have different interpretations of what walking is. If one defines walking as walking with our body to someplace, or aimlessly, then it is doubtable. But if one defines walking as how one walks in a dream, or the thought of walking, then it is a thought, and therefore since it is a thought, they exist. Since Descartes found this certainty that one exists because they have the ability to think, he has just defeated skepticism and attained a piece of perfect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To another individual, God may exist simply because of the evidence around them. I think the existence…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But from time to time I have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.” (Descartes 33) However, after focusing on that concept he realized that in order to think and doubt the existence of everything, he must first exist. Following that line of reasoning, he realized that his existence was the only thing he knew to be true, and by extension, his intellect and his ability to think was also…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example n Descartes writing of the third meditation Descartes writes that since God isn’t a deceiver because Descartes writes we clearly and distinctly view god as a non-deceiver. Then he says God’s existence provides us with clear and distinct…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    prove it by just stating that is it something that exits in your mind. You have to be able to prove that it physically does exist. The fact that it is in your mind is not sufficient proof. Gaunilos argument is somewhat the same to Immanuel Kants. Conceiving the idea of God cannot in any way be thought to genuinely lead to conceving the idea that “God exists”.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes says that when he is in a dream he can feel the heat of a fire even though the fire is not there. That feeling of warmth seems real even though he is asleep. Descartes senses deceive him which makes him question if his senses are always deceptive. In Conclusion, Descartes argues that one cannot prove we exist or are part of a concrete world.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In view of St. Thomas Aquinas, Anselm, and John Hick's speculations on the existance of God, one could presume that God does exists both in all actuality and comprehension as a result of the considerable number of signs and images that are available in the public eye. God exist in light of the fact that we need him to exist, and he exists for the purpose and souls of every person. God gives us the capacity to settle on our own choices in view of recognizing what is great or wickedness. Knowing and comprehension is the way to God's existence. People are the main creaters on earth that have that capacity.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    He exists not contingently, but necessarily. It is impossible for God not to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm details several biblical texts like Job, Pslam, Timothy to support his statements and make clear that if you’re doubting his existence you’re a fool. Yet he doesn’t really have any strong argumentation other than mere inferences and cited biblical accounts of a being who supposedly holds the title all perfect. We can’t just infer that if the human mind hears such a statement like his first premise it would immediately lead him to associate that conception to of God. And if it were that case then we should begin to asses what kind of religious views these minds hold in order to come to such a conclusion. Not holding any form of religious views can maybe have an altering effect to whom we may attribute and conclude such a conception upon which Anselm doesn’t really take into account.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the worldview of the skeptic, if there is a skeptical hypothesis for something, then that certain thing could not be known. If I were to hold the belief that the grass is green, a skeptic would say, “well, how do you know that grass is actually there? It could be a projection of your imagination. How can I be certain that how you see green is the same way I see green?” The skeptic’s insistence upon certainty in knowledge is challenged for except the knowledge that you yourself exists.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays