How Did Henry I Revolutionize The Legal System

Great Essays
By 1100 King Henry I had already put into place jurisdictions, courts and customs that were well regarded by the people of England. However, after the Anarchy of Stephen and Matilda, the law and order that stemmed from Henry I’s reign was no longer. When Henry II, the grandson of Henry I, ascended the throne in 1154, the period of reconstruction and great reform had begun. He not only promised to reinstitutionalize the ideals of his grandfather that were spent during the reign of King Stephen, but the well-educated king will also revolutionize the common law system in England, making it uniform throughout the land, and much like we know it today. With the changes he brought about in way common law was practiced, he also changes English society and culture. Reforming the way the courts and community were involved in the legal system, they way the guilty were indicted, and the cases that he heard, King Henry II was a fundamental part of the new shape of the legal system that we know today, and why we consider him …show more content…
Westminster had starting hearing legal cases, even when they did not directly involve the royal law, and by 1170, legal professionals who specialized in hearing cases and later became known as the Court of Common Bench, had developed. Henry II also had judges traveling the countryside to judge legal cases. During Henry I’s reign, he had judges travel the countryside as well, but they didn’t judge the cases, they just merely presided over them. Local landowners would judge the cases based on local ideologies. With the Assize of Clarendon of 1166 and the Assize of Northampton of 1176 it made royal juries a fundamental part of the law system. And because of Henry II’s new design of the court system, the ideologies and rulings of the court were now cohesive throughout his land (Hollister, p

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Shakespeare's King Henry V is a play set in the early fifteenth century about the King of England conquering France and taking the throne. This play shows King Henry’s leadership qualities throughout the story such as wisdom, integrity, determination, and graciousness. My career in the health informatics field relates closely to the leadership qualities represented by King Henry. King Henry V shows wisdom throughout the play in many scenes. For example, King Henry thoroughly thinks about his plan to conquer France, before he actually does it.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When fickle Henry the VIII wanted to annul his marriage, he passed the Act of Supremacy, which instituted him as head of the English Church. Alongside with the act of Successions and Appeals, Henry created his own branch of religion to promote his own selfish needs. However, the way the religion was implemented was significant. He passed these large acts that were different from what other rulers had done. With his act of Successions, all his subjects had to swear their oath to him and his supremacy.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people needed a king who will care for the concerns and welfare of the kingdom. And to their happiness, Henry the V did just that. Being a young king, his life was still often times wrapped around pleasure seeking activities. Yet, unlike other young kings Henry V took his mantle of king seriously. It was his profession and he was determined to see it done well.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Battle Of Bouvines Essay

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In 1214, Otto, the Holy Roman Emperor, the Counts of Boulogne, Flanders, Brabant, Salisbury and Dammartin lost a battle they should never have fought at Battle of Bouvines despite outnumbering the French by 10000 men. The chance to retake Normandy had gone. John had been unable to join Otto as his Lusignac/Poitevin allies refused to fight Prince Louis’ army at Roche aux Moins – an attack that had been designed to draw royalist troops away from Normandy. John retired to Aquitaine. Battle of Bouvines: the loss of Normandy in 1214…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime and Punishment in the 1800s Imagine you are caught stealing a candy bar at your neighborhood gas station. The owner of the gas station calls the police and they arrest you. Your punishment would be way more intense than it would be in today's world. If you were lucky you would only receive a sentenced of a few years consisting of manual labor in the scorching summer sun.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court’s system began when the Norman conquered England, the establishments of courts was a way of unifying the country. Their intentions were to establish a common, or uniform, set of rules for the whole country. The body of judge-made laws that was developed under the system is still used today, which is known as the common law, applying decisions to similar situations. With newer cases, they relied on precedents in deciding the case. As for the United States, the United Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, sees that precedent are bind on all lower courts.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Law? The foundation of the Anglo-American Law is dated back to the Norman Conquest in 1066. William the Conqueror was the first king in England to establish courts and laws that were common throughout the land. The common laws, originally from England are still in effect today.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the years, the role and the responsibility of the jury have been through numerous transformations, hence these improvements made the presence of jury trials a highly controversial topic, leading to the question ‘Are juries needed in the English legal system?’. This essay aims to argue this question from different perspectives. It will first describe the evolution of the jury system and their current role in UK justice. Then, it will go through to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of having such a system using relevant cases. Lastly, it will mention the alternatives for the jury system and conclude by providing an answer to the question mentioned above.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abuse of Judicial Power in the Victorian Era vs. Today “The strong were always eating the weak.” - James Rollins. This connects to the abuse of judicial power because countless judicial leaders take advantage or do not give the unentitled a say because of personal benefit or bias. The abuse of judicial power is a social issue that occurs when someone with higher power abuses their power in the courtroom, makes the wrong discretion against one being tried. This social issue is comprised of several different problems, such as disrespect in the court, corruption, bias, or conflict of interest.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Trial Advantages

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Trial by Jury is a venerated feature of the English Legal System and traces its roots back to Magna Carta in 1215. However, despite being the subject of media scrutiny in more recent years, it is important to consider the merits of the jury system as it represents more than just democratic fairness, they embody dedication to delivering justice and encompass a unique set of morals used as guidance to deliver it correctly. Perhaps the benefits of jury trials are best argued when considering the alternative of a judge-led trial which gives power to a single individual to administer justice. Through further exploration, jury trials can be seen as the only system able to not only guarantee justice, but to also deliver it effectively on the basis that they are a group of unbiased citizens, able to deliver their verdicts independently from the judiciary, to avoid any influence, and the state, to avoid any interference.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theme Of Heroism In A Farewell To Arms

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Henry’s actions whether he believed so or not, were very honorable. What Henry experienced during this particular time significantly impacted him and helped him break away from the blueprint of the “average…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Equity in New Zealand, its relationship with common law, and the ‘fusion’ debate The equitable jurisdiction was defined in 1932 as “that body of rules administered by our English courts of justice which, were it not for the operation of the Judicature Acts, would be administered only by those courts which would be known as courts of Equity”. The New Zealand legal system is based on English common law and therefore the principles of Equity as they stand today are rooted in English history. However, following the implementation of the Judicature Act 1908 (NZ) and subsequent legal developments, the views of the New Zealand courts with respect to the intermingling of equitable and common law remedies can be observed to now be markedly…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Judges in our court system is one of the most important roles within our relative communities, they are the main point of interpretation when it comes to the law. Be it civil or criminal, they assess the evidence, and hopefully have an unbiased mind towards the pursuit of justice. Despite legislature being made through Parliament, Judges are able to teach the people through the means of precedent what laws actually mean. They help the general public to know to what extent they are abiding by the law and punishable offences under the law. The question that is being asked is whether or not Judges have the right to be creative in their rulings, or should they simply apply the law just the way it is?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays