Watching the first debate was an interesting experience for me as I have never seen the US election debates before. I believe the introduction debate is one of the most crucial debates, since people will see for the first time what candidates are planning to do and whether or not they are comfortable with their plans. In this debate, there were three topics that candidates had to cover. In my essay, I will discuss Hillary Clinton's arguments and objections, as well as, Donald Trump's arguments. I will elaborate between their argument and plans. Also, I will write my opinion about this debate. The first topic was about how they are planning to achieve prosperity. Clinton started her debates with stating that she will build an economy for everyone. By economy for everyone, she meant that she will improve manufacturing, as well as, providing more jobs. She was willing to make corporations to share not just with top executives but with people. Furthermore, Clinton affirmed that she will make same pay to women. Trump started his debates by stating his plans about returning back jobs and companies back from overseas. By doing that, he wants to improve our economy. His plan consist of reducing taxes to 15% for companies and small businesses, and renegotiating trade deals. According to Trump, his plan will create 25 million jobs by doing so. He argued that our trade deals with Mexico are not fair because when they sell to US, there is no tax; however, when US sell to Mexico, there is a tax. Clinton objected that independent experts showed that in reality Trump's plan will loose $5T and loose 3.5 million jobs. On the other hand, Clinton's plan will make 10 million jobs. Trump articulated that there is no need for a lot of business regulations, since wealthy people will create jobs. Also, he argued that it was not smart to spend $6T on Middle East when we have $30T in debt. Clinton disagreed with him by stating the country should invest in middle class and make colleges debt free, so more people will be specialists. Next topic was American Direction. Clinton affirmed that US has to restore trust, also she wants to make sure that police is well prepared to use force when necessary and to work with them, as well as, violate guns. Trump's objection was the importance of law and order, he argued that this is the only way we can decrease violence. He want's to take guns away from criminals. Moreover, he affirmed that usually immigrant's bands are in charge of killings.
…show more content…
As to Hillary Clinton, I liked that she had plans and facts how to do certain things done and how to make them real. I think she was better prepared than Trump. Trump did a good job, but I think that a lot of his plans are unrealistic. There is no way a tax will be as low as 15% for corporations. He did not answer how he will bring companies back. Also, I liked that Clinton's policies are more diplomatic. She showed that she cares for everyone. She believes in economy for everyone and in my opinion that is one of the most important factors for future president. However, I did not like that instead of talking about their plans, they spent a lot of time talking about their
As to Hillary Clinton, I liked that she had plans and facts how to do certain things done and how to make them real. I think she was better prepared than Trump. Trump did a good job, but I think that a lot of his plans are unrealistic. There is no way a tax will be as low as 15% for corporations. He did not answer how he will bring companies back. Also, I liked that Clinton's policies are more diplomatic. She showed that she cares for everyone. She believes in economy for everyone and in my opinion that is one of the most important factors for future president. However, I did not like that instead of talking about their plans, they spent a lot of time talking about their