Hannibal Barca's Second Punic War

Great Essays
Hannibal Barca is widely considered to have been one of the greatest military commanders of all time. In the second Punic war, he marched an army of elephants, cavalry, and infantry over the Alps to assault Rome in their home territory, his most famous achievement, and fought a war that soaked Italy in blood for more than a decade. In the end, due to lack of support from Carthage, Hannibal was unable to take Rome itself, though he defeated many Roman armies, and he was forced to return to Carthage to defend it against a Roman counterattack. He lost much of his force on the way, and was defeated for the first time in North Africa, sealing Roman victory and dominance in the Mediterranean. His war, while coming impressively close to success, was …show more content…
These factors led to a war the likes of which have rarely been seen throughout history, and whose repercussions are still felt to this day. The Second Punic War determined once and for all the dominant power in the Mediterranean, and, ultimately, the world. Had Carthage triumphed; had a few things gone just slightly differently, the world would be a very different place, with Carthaginian culture at its center. Rome’s victory allowed it to develop into the world empire it became, and its power was not seriously challenged again for six hundred years. It never truly fell, for even after the Western half of the empire deteriorated and crumbled to pieces, no other culture replaced it, and it continued to shape the world to this day. After defeating Carthage, Rome became the embodiment of the west for more than half a millennium. During these centuries, Rome changed the world around it, spreading Roman culture around three continents and laying the groundwork for the next two thousand years of western …show more content…
Hannibal's War : A Military History of the Second Punic War. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998.
Excellent detail on entire second Punic War, by great military scholar on period. Analysis of causes of outcomes.
Polybius, Mortimer Chambers, and E. Badian. Polybius: The Histories. Vol. 2. New York: Twayne, 1966. Print.
Good full detailed overview of his life with more details than other overview articles. Can be used to corroborate other sources.
Lendering, Jona. "Hannibal Barca." - Livius. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2015. http://www.livius.org/articles/person/hannibal-3-barca/ Solid, thorough information source covering whole punic war and life afterwards, including factors leading to his death.
Livy, Titus. The History of Rome. Vol. 3. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1905.
Original account of Titus Livy, a Roman historian who lived through the war, though it carries a strong bias against Hannibal.
"Carthage." Roman-empire.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Poison King by Adrienne Mayor The book, Poison King by Adrienne Mayor, portrays a life that is characterized with manifestation and anticipation. It asserts Alexander the Great together with Darius of Persia as Mithradates predecessors who acquired a rich wealthy Black Sea kingdom when he was a teenager at 14years after his mother killed his father. He escaped into exile but came back in triumph to be a king of top notch intellect and stern objectives. He is seen as a savior by his supporters and treated in awe as a second Hannibal by his foes (Mayor, Mithradates p. 34).…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of his most popular accomplishments was at the episode of the Second Punic War, when he walked an armed force, which included elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into Italy. In his initial couple of years in Italy, he won three emotional triumphs Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae, in which he separated himself for his capacity to focus his and his rival's qualities and shortcomings, and to play the fight to his qualities and the foe's shortcomings and won over numerous partners of Rome. Hannibal involved much of Italy for a long time, yet a Roman counter-attack of North Africa constrained him to come back to Carthage, where he was unequivocally vanquished by Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama. Scipio had considered Hannibal's strategies and splendidly concocted some of his own, lastly crushed Rome's adversary at Zama, having at one time driven Hasdrubal, Hannibal's sibling, out of the Iberian…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hannibal Barca, commander of the Carthaginian army, led his men against the Romans during the Second Punic War. For fifteen years Hannibal out manoeuvred and defeated the Romans time and time again. Hannibal can be considered as one of the best commanders of all antiquity because of his tactical use of terrain to his advantage, his use of psychological warfare to lure the Romans in, and his ability to create a sizeable functioning army made of mercenaries. A great commander does not solely rely on his men for victory.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (notes) This adoption was condemned by Cato the elder who saw it as a symbol of everything that was wrong with the Roman republic but could do nothing about it. The Third Punic War lasted from 149-146. At first the Romans did poorly and under pressure from the Roman people, the senate passed a law that allowed Aemilianus to have pro-consular authority. In 146 he destroyed Carthage.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Military tactics have evolved throughout history, one of the most important examples is the battle of Cannae. Facing all-out war against Rome for the second time, Carthage employed tactics the likes of which had not been seen. Hannibal Barca during the second Punic war forced Rome’s hand at the Battle of Cannae. Utilizing previous battle experience, the unorthodox makeup of his army and his overwhelming military tactics. Following the events of the first Punic war between Rome and carthage, Spain was divided into two parts.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    With influence from his father and his older brother Hasdrubal, Hannibal always looked to a powerful figure for inspiration of great warfare and power. Whilst Hannibal has been credited for having great leadership and military qualities, Livy states that ‘the man’s great virtues were matched by his enormous vices: pitiless cruelty, a treachery worse than Punic, no regard for truth, and no integrity, no fear of the gods or respect for an oath, and no scruples’ . Who Hannibal was as a soldier and leader was a large contributor to the ways in which the events leading to the war occurred. The attack and capture on Saguntum was a well thought out plan by Hannibal to ensure a reaction from the Romans. This failure on Rome’s part to protect Saguntum from Hannibal and the Carthaginians cost Rome any chance of gaining allies within Spain to fight against the Carthaginians.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ancient Rome, military leaders had certain expectations placed on them from society and the government. The Gallic War, was used as propaganda for Caesar as a military leader, but also gives readers insight into Roman culture. The Gallic War chronicles Julius Caesar’s campaigns from 58-51 BCE. He was later assassinated by his alleged friends in 44 BCE.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As I’m about to finish reading “Total War Rome Destroy Carthage” I’ve really enjoyed it so far. The events in the book have all led up to one thing which is when the Romans attempt to take over Carthage. The characters in the book were very unique and all had different personalities. As I continued to read the book David Gibbins perfectly describes the battles in a unique manner where if you were to close your eyes you could imagine them happening. The story was well written because it had a lot of characters that are non-fictional such as Ameilius Paullus, Andriscus, Demetrius, Ennius, Gaius Paullus and many more.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He took pity on himself. Sometimes you can’t catch ‘em all, sometimes your power level is only at 8,999, he wasn’t used to the feeling of lost. Being the amazing war general he was, he could have sprung back into action. Another reason the Carthaginians lost the war was because Hannibal took pity on himself and gave…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main reason of the Punic Wars was the fight of interests between the Carthaginian Empire and the Roman Republic. The Romans were interested in expansion through Sicily (which at that time was a “cultural melting pot”), which were under Carthaginian control. At the start of the first Punic War, Carthage was the central power of the Western Mediterranean, with a widespread naval empire, while Rome was…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hannibal marched an army from Spain over the Pyrenees and the Alps into Northern Italy and defeated the Romans at the Battles of the River Trebia in 218 B.C. In 189 B.C. When one of Hannibal’s enemies, Antiochus, tried to turn Hannibal in, he fled instead of being captured.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carthage was the location where the Phoenicians settled in 800 BCE (Duiker). The reason for the Punic Wars was the land of Sicily. Both cities wanted control of Sicily for its strong economy. War 1 happened from 264 BCE-241 BCE and War 2 occurred from 218 BCE-201 BCE. The wars were fought against the same cities, were both about Sicily, and Rome won both wars, but the first two Punic Wars were substantially different.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hannibal Tactics

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Romans believed that hannibal had no chance because the Roman army was many times the size of Hannibal’s, but they were mistaken. Hannibal used a convex crescent shape that slowly became concave and surrounded the Romans when under pressure (“Hannibal Barca”). His unusual tactics…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Titus Livius and The Early History of Rome Roman history is subjective to those who study it and write about the rise and the fall of the Roman Empire. One ancient historian named Titus Livius, who was born in either 59 B.C. or 64 B.C. , had written a series of books titled History of Rome. Not much is known about Titus Livius in his younger years except that he had lived in the city of Padua, which had suffered greatly in Rome’s Civil War. His books are split into several different decades of Rome’s rich history. The first series he wrote in History of Rome are broken down in five separate book(s) titled: “Rome under the Kings”, “The Beginning of the Republic”, “The Patricians at Bay”, “War and Politics”, and lastly “The Capture of Rome”.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The battle field was now set and two hostile armies occupied either shore of the river Trebia. Here again Hannibal showed his great skill as a general, one that is well documented so is more than…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays