Hamlet Argumentative Essay

The original text of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, has not changed significantly over the years. The text has been reprinted into a multitude of facsimiles, all retaining the same style of writing and speaking used in the original copy. The original play of Hamlet has been adapted over the years in film, to make an iconic and historic play more relatable to its audiences. These adaptations retain the combination of verse and prose used in the original version of Hamlet. This shows that Hamlet can be adapted to fit the modern day audience without corrupting the original story of Hamlet.
The broad reach of Shakespeare films has resulted in many more people, experiencing the dramatist in performance through film than through stage productions. …show more content…
Some argue that adapting classic works of art into a movie, ruins the work and can take away from the story because sometimes certain parts of the book cannot make it into the movie. The significance of my argument is that in order to keep old literature alive, it has to be adapted to modern society. The best way to adapt, a classic like Hamlet is through film. This allows modern audiences to enjoy a piece of work that was created four centuries ago, and it makes the text more relatable to the audience, without altering …show more content…
In a screenplay, the movement, actions, expression, and dialogues of the characters are narrated. The screenplay consists of the film’s dialogue and a description of the basic camera movements the director intends to use in shooting the film. In both Olivier and Almereyda’s versions, the text of Hamlet has to be substantially trimmed and most of the time, rearranged in the screenplay to allow it to adapt to the conventions of film and to keep the film from becoming too long. There are notable physical and material differences between the screenplays of Olivier and