Gary Kleck Point Blank Analysis

Improved Essays
Richard Alba and Steven Messner study the concern of guns, crime, and gun control in Gary Kleck’s book “Point Blank”. They publicize the flaws in Kleck’s analysis and linkages within his evidence and inferences. They concur with Kleck on the gun control debate that it needs grounding in the evidence and set out to examine the foundations for some of the contentious conclusions by Gary Kleck and others. The examples they use demonstrate disagreements of authors' opinion on the control of guns. Their point is the key issue of the balance of guns and crime. Kleck acknowledges the position that guns have as a component contributing to crime rates, but he counterpoises the bad side and good side of guns to summon attention to the use of guns by …show more content…
The examples indicate that ownership of a gun has become more concentrated, with 48% of people reporting that they had five or more guns. They argue that the United States has few limits on ownership of the firearm. A number of states with the right to carry laws has raised. A study in 2015 found that the right to carry law may increase gun violence more than decrease it. In 2011, a survey revealed that there were nearly 37,000 attempts made to get a weapon illegally, even with the limited regulations in the United States. Research and anecdotal evidence indicate that there are a significant number of firearms that have been smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border. Devon Maylie and Leighton Kille studies have shown that the exact number of firearms imported to the Mexico border is hard to quantify. Garen Wintemute explains the risk of having exposure to guns in the household. He uses an example of schoolmates who have been invited to a party on Halloween that stop at someone elses house by mistake. On the day of Halloween, Mr. Rodney and Mrs. Bonnie Peairs were in their house and two boys had stopped …show more content…
He argues that if the Second Amendment allows the ownership of guns for personal reasons, the statutes will remain valid as reasonable restrictions of those rights. Garen Wintemute gives the reader implications that the Second Amendment promises people that they can only have the right to bear arms in service of a well-regulated state militia. Jens Ludwig and his colleague Philip J. Cook studied on whether the Brady Act was associated with a decrease in rates of homicide and suicide. They use examples of data for adults because they are the primary target population, and they classified 32 states that enact background checks for a 5-day waiting period. The examples indicate that the Brady Act could be a decrease in the rates of violence that guns have. They argue that they have no evidence in their analysis to prove the Brady Act was related to the reduction in rates of homicide, but by decreasing the flow of guns from treatment states into the secondary gun markets could have negative affiliations with the homicide rates. Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook studies show the audience that the Brady Act has been associated with decreases in firearm suicide rates, but not within overall suicide and homicide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The majority of McMahan’s claims are based on the fact that guns should be outlawed because we should not need them. However, all one has to do is compare McMahan’s claims to situations in the world around us. The first example the author makes is that “when most citizens are armed, as they were in the Wild West, crime doesn’t cease” (391). This argument is easily rebutted as his claim is based upon events that have taken place over one-hundred years ago. This claim does not take into consideration the improvements in law enforcement as well as the Judicial system that have taken place since the days of the ‘Wild West’.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Brady Campaign presents the cons of lenient gun laws by showing emotion and statistics on their website in several ways: “ Of the 33,000 people who die from gun violence in this country, how many could be saved? “ and “ Gun Violence Takes A Massive Toll on American Children “. This presents credibility towards the gun control advocate group as they are able to provide information that can change the society's view on gun control. By providing this information, we are able to understand that this group’s incentive is pressured by the amount of deaths caused by guns. Brady Campaign appeals to society as they persuade you that by enforcing stricter gun laws, you are able to save more lives.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Adam Gopnik’s essay “Shootings,” he shows concerned with the growth of gun violence in the United Sates, and the lack of action from the government in making strong and restrictive gun control laws to prevent further deaths and massacres by guns. Gopnik was even more concerned on how easy it is for people with a history of mental illness acquiring weapons that were only made to kill people. By comparing United States with others countries which have restrictive and tightens gun control laws, Gopnik shows how deaths by mass shooting has decreased in those countries since the government started to taking action, and they never had to experience the same incident as severe as the first one. The main purpose of the Gopnik essay is to persuade…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blow skillfully entwines in credible statistics and reference books that gear his audience's awareness towards this regularly debated topic. Although he only uses three sources, he places them in a way throughout the piece that make them effective. Blow starts by citing Samuel Brier of the Urban Institutes article about where criminals obtain their guns. The statistical evidence found is potent in revealing to the audience that nearly half a million guns are stolen each year (p.12). Perhaps the most compelling and eye-opening evidence provided Blow derived from a book called “The Challenge of Crime” written in 2003 by the Harvard university press.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professors from Bloomberg School of Public Health Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick reveled intriguing results from their study. “In addition to the 31,672 people killed by guns in 2010, another 73,505 were treated in hospital emergency rooms for nonfatal bullet wounds, and 337,960 nonfatal violent crimes were committed with guns. Of those 31,672 dead, 61 percent were suicides, and the vast majority of the rest were homicides by people who knew one another”(shermer). It is now know that some Americans in society take their freedom to bare arms for granted. Every day some Americans are being shot, wither it is out of jealously or hate, their lives are on a balance of life or death.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Events

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On September 3, 1 man was found dead, 1 man was hospitalized, and 1 man was injured. This event occurred at the Sacramento Community College in California. Some people believe that events such as this still would have occurred if their was Gun Control. Some believe that with Gun Control events like this would never have happened. On September 3, 2015, the Sacramento Community College went into lockdown for two hours because of an that had occurred on campus earlier that day.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author cites the state of California and the city of Chicago as having extremely strict gun control laws while having some of the highest crime rates in the United States. The article then states that instead of people wanting more regulation on guns, they should instead be push for better mental health care. Then the author begins to critique the laws that people have said would reduce the danger of shootings. The article states that even though drugs are banned they are still produced and sold, and how criminals would not follow the laws of gun-free…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a study published in 2012, the number of gun-related murders committed is at its lowest rate since 1981, even with an increased amount of people owning firearms (Gun Rhetoric, 2012). On the opposite side of the spectrum, those that support stricter gun control policies argue that the Second Amendment does not provide an unlimited right to own guns (US Supreme Court). Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment is as dated as The Constitution and that it was intended only for militia . Nowhere in the Second Amendment is it explicitly stated that it was created to protect an individual’s right to bear arms (Waldman,…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays