Communication between a teacher and the student(s) will influence the behavior of the student’s in the classroom. If they hardly communicate, students may feel they do not care and begin to act up. He believes that punishment should not be used because it can cause the student to become hostile and angry, which in the end leads to the child continuing to act up and misbehave. Teachers should communicate with the student in a positive manner and avoid saying ‘you’ and labeling them. If you say a student is ‘bad,’ they will become discourage and hurt and see themselves as ‘bad’ even when they are in fact, …show more content…
He wants student’s to choose appropriate behaviors. He believes students have internal motivation that will guide their behavior. We just have to provide it for them. If they are off task and not motivated, we should finds ways to make them motivated. He believes punishment is destructive and that rewards should not be given. He believes that punishment and rewards is just a way of manipulating behavior rather than actually altering the behavior. o The most useful thing of his theory is the idea of how rewards should not be given out. When you give a reward, you are not really changing the behavior, just manipulating and masking it to fit the way you want. A student will continue to act a certain way, but when being watched by the teacher, will act how they want to get the reward. The least useful part is how we should find ways to make unmotivated students motivated. Not every student is going to find something motivating, and as a teacher, we can sit down with every student individually and find out what motivates him or her. If we could, that would work well, but there is not enough time to do it